Abstract:<h3 class="block__title">Policy Points</h3><ul class="unordered-list"><li>The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has in recent years allowed onto the market several drugs with limited evidence of safety and effectiveness, provided that manufacturers agree to carry out additional studies while the drugs are in clinical use.</li><li>Studies suggest that these postmarketing requirements (PMRs) frequently lack transparency, are subject to delays, and fail to answer the questions of greatest clinical importance. Yet, none of the literature speaks directly to the challenges that the FDA—as a regulatory institution—encounters in enforcing PMRs.</li><li>Through a series of interviews with FDA leadership, this article analyzes and situates those challenges in the midst of political threats to the FDA's public health mandate.</li></ul><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Context</h3><p>Modern pharmaceutical regulation is premised on a rigorous examination of a drug's safety and effectiveness prior to its lawful sale. However, since the 1990s, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has gradually shifted to a model of "lifecycle" regulation that increasingly relies on postmarketing requirements (PMRs) to encourage studies of drug safety and effectiveness following regulatory approval. This article examines the range of legal, institutional, and political challenges that FDA faces in the context of lifecycle regulation.</p><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>Document‐based legal and policy analysis was combined with a set of semistructured interviews of current and former FDA officials (<i>n</i> = 23) in order to explore the implications of the FDA's use of PMRs. The median interview time per official was 61 minutes, with a range of 24 to 227 minutes. All of the officials interviewed occupied positions of leadership and influence within the FDA, such as directors of an FDA center or office, key legal counsel on agency‐wide policy initiatives, and the commissioner of the FDA. </p><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Findings</h3><p>Insufficient resources and coordination within the FDA, inadequate legal authorities, and the political economy of withdrawing an approved indication in the face of opposition from companies and patients all contribute to the observed shortcomings in the FDA's use and enforcement of PMRs. Further, the FDA is fully aware of these challenges, yet is seemingly resigned to and resistant to criticism of its use of PMRs.</p><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>This study of the FDA's shift toward lifecycle regulation reveals not simply an agency in transition, but rather an agency on guard against a set of larger political threats to its mandate. This can be characterized as a state of institutional incumbency in which the agency is engaged in an effort to reproduce key features of the regulatory system—in concert with regulated industries and others—while simultaneously sanctioning significant changes to the regulatory standards the FDA has long applied, to the detriment of public health.</p>

Advancing structured decision‐making in drug regulation at the FDA and EMA

A Structured Benefit-Risk Assessment Operating Model for Investigational Medicinal Products in the Pharmaceutical Industry

Dynamic Regulatory Assessment: Unpacking the Process Reveals Readiness to Pilot for Europe-An EFPIA View

Awareness and use of quantitative decision-making methods in pharmaceutical development

Cost benefit analysis and the FDA: measuring the costs and benefits of drug approval under the PDUFA I-II, 1998–2005

Leveraging Prior Quantitative Knowledge to Guide Drug Development Decisions and Regulatory Science Recommendations: Impact of FDA Pharmacometrics During 2004-2006.

The use of mechanistic evidence in drug approval

Comparative Analysis of Post-Authorization Measures for Advanced Medicinal Products Authorized in the European Union and in the United States of America Between 2009 and 2023

Contribution of Real‐World Evidence in European Medicines Agency's Regulatory Decision Making

Integrating Real-World Evidence in the Regulatory Decision-Making Process: A Systematic Analysis of Experiences in the US, EU, and China Using a Logic Model

Innovation for Generic Drugs: Science and Research Under the Generic Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012

The Qualitative Value of Facilitated Regulatory Pathways in Europe, USA, and Japan: Benefits, Barriers to Utilization, and Suggested Solutions

Experience Learned and Perspectives on Using Model-Integrated Evidence in the Regulatory Context for Generic Drug Products—a Meeting Report

Digital Tools-Regulatory Considerations for Application in Clinical Trials

Pharmaceutical Drugs of Uncertain Value, Lifecycle Regulation at the US Food and Drug Administration, and Institutional Incumbency

How Modeling and Simulation Have Enhanced Decision Making in New Drug Development

Application of implementation science framework to develop and adopt regulatory science in different national regulatory authorities

Seeing the whole elephant: integrated advanced data analytics in support of RWE for the development and use of innovative pharmaceuticals

Implementation and pratical aspects of quantitative decision-making in clinical drug development

Supporting a data-driven approach to regulatory intelligence

Applications of Model-Based Meta-Analysis in Drug Development