Abstract:BackgroundIn biomedical research, response variables are often encountered which have bounded support on the open unit interval - (0,1). Traditionally, researchers have attempted to estimate covariate effects on these types of response data using linear regression. Alternative modelling strategies may include: beta regression, variable-dispersion beta regression, and fractional logit regression models. This study employs a Monte Carlo simulation design to compare the statistical properties of the linear regression model to that of the more novel beta regression, variable-dispersion beta regression, and fractional logit regression models.MethodsIn the Monte Carlo experiment we assume a simple two sample design. We assume observations are realizations of independent draws from their respective probability models. The randomly simulated draws from the various probability models are chosen to emulate average proportion/percentage/rate differences of pre-specified magnitudes. Following simulation of the experimental data we estimate average proportion/percentage/rate differences. We compare the estimators in terms of bias, variance, type-1 error and power. Estimates of Monte Carlo error associated with these quantities are provided.ResultsIf response data are beta distributed with constant dispersion parameters across the two samples, then all models are unbiased and have reasonable type-1 error rates and power profiles. If the response data in the two samples have different dispersion parameters, then the simple beta regression model is biased. When the sample size is small (N0 = N1 = 25) linear regression has superior type-1 error rates compared to the other models. Small sample type-1 error rates can be improved in beta regression models using bias correction/reduction methods. In the power experiments, variable-dispersion beta regression and fractional logit regression models have slightly elevated power compared to linear regression models. Similar results were observed if the response data are generated from a discrete multinomial distribution with support on (0,1).ConclusionsThe linear regression model, the variable-dispersion beta regression model and the fractional logit regression model all perform well across the simulation experiments under consideration. When employing beta regression to estimate covariate effects on (0,1) response data, researchers should ensure their dispersion sub-model is properly specified, else inferential errors could arise.

On a logistic regression model with random intercept: diagnostic analytics, simulation and biological application

Residuals and Regression Diagnostics: Focusing on Logistic Regression

Evaluation of Logistic Regression Applied to Respondent-Driven Samples: Simulated and Real Data

Random eects logistic models for analyzing ecacy of a longitudinal randomized treatment with non-adherence

Modelling correlated ordinal data by random-effects logistic regression models: simulation and application

On the comparison of regression coefficients across multiple logistic models with binary predictors

Logistic regression and other statistical tools in diagnostic biomarker studies

Bayesian Regression Analysis of Data with Random Effects Covariates from Nonlinear Longitudinal Measurements

Logistic regression analysis with standardized markers

Computational Aspects Of Analyzing Random Effects Longitudinal Models

Multi-category diagnostic accuracy based on logistic regression

Random-effect Based Test for Multinomial Logistic Regression: Choice of the Reference Level and Its Impact on the Testing

Influence Diagnostics in Meta-Regression Model

A Monte Carlo simulation study comparing linear regression, beta regression, variable-dispersion beta regression and fractional logit regression at recovering average difference measures in a two sample design

Repro Samples Method for High-dimensional Logistic Model

Asymmetric Independence Model for Detecting Interactions between Variables

Random Effects Models for Analyzing Mixed Overdispersed Binomial and Normal Longitudinal Responses With Application to Kidney Function Data of Cancer Patients

On the global identifiability of logistic regression models with misclassified outcomes

A two-part mixed-effects model for analyzing longitudinal microbiome compositional data

Simulation Study on Local Influence Diagnosis for Poisson Mixed-Effect Linear Model

Variable selection for sparse Dirichlet-multinomial regression with an application to microbiome data analysis