Marine and Freshwater Sounds Impact Invertebrate Behavior and Physiology: A Meta‐Analysis
Hailey L. Davies,Kieran D. Cox,Kelsie A. Murchy,Hailey M. Shafer,Audrey Looby,Francis Juanes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17593
IF: 11.6
2024-11-28
Global Change Biology
Abstract:We analyzed 46 studies to determine how sounds from various sources (i.e., human‐made noise, environmental sounds, computer‐generated or synthetic sounds, and music) influence aquatic invertebrates. Results show that human and synthetic sounds harm invertebrate behavior and physiology, and environmental (e.g., natural reef) sounds can be beneficial. These findings suggest that noise pollution can impact many aquatic invertebrate species, especially arthropods (e.g., crabs and lobsters) and molluscs (e.g., mussels and squid), and highlight the importance of considering invertebrates in noise policies and aquatic ecosystem conservation efforts. The diversity of biotic and abiotic sounds that fill underwater ecosystems has become polluted by anthropogenic noise in recent decades. Yet, there is still great uncertainty surrounding how different acoustic stimuli influence marine and freshwater (i.e., aquatic) communities. Despite capabilities to detect and produce sounds, aquatic invertebrates are among the most understudied taxa within the field of soundscape ecology. We conducted a meta‐analysis to understand how sounds from various sources influence the behavior and physiology of aquatic invertebrates. We extracted 835 data points from 46 studies conducted in 15 countries. The resulting data included 50 species, a range of experimental conditions, and four sound categories: anthropogenic, environmental, synthetic, and music. We used meta‐analytic multivariate mixed‐effect models to determine how each sound category influenced aquatic invertebrates and if responses were homogeneous across taxa. Our analyses illustrate that anthropogenic noise and synthetic sounds have detrimental impacts on aquatic invertebrate behavior and physiology, and that environmental sounds have slightly beneficial effects on their behavior. Defence responses were the most impacted behaviors, while the most prominent physiological responses were related to biochemistry, genetics, and morphology. Additionally, arthropods and molluscs exhibited the most pronounced physiological responses to anthropogenic and synthetic noise. These findings support the conclusion that many invertebrate species are sensitive to changes in aquatic soundscapes, which can cause adverse or favorable consequences to individuals and populations, dependent on the sound source. This quantitative synthesis highlights the necessity of including marine and freshwater invertebrates in acoustic exposure studies, aquatic ecosystem assessments, and emerging noise pollution policies.
environmental sciences,biodiversity conservation,ecology