Abstract:Educators and commenters who evaluate big data-driven learning environments focus on specific questions: whether automated education platforms improve learning outcomes, invade student privacy, and promote equality. This article puts aside separate unresolved-and perhaps unresolvable-issues regarding the concrete effects of specific technologies. It instead examines how big data-driven tools alter the structure of schools' pedagogical decision-making, and, in doing so, change fundamental aspects of America's education enterprise. Technological mediation and data-driven decision-making have a particularly significant impact in learning environments because the education process primarily consists of dynamic information exchange. In this overview, I highlight three significant structural shifts that accompany school reliance on data-driven instructional platforms that perform core school functions: teaching, assessment, and credentialing. First, virtual learning environments create information technology infrastructures featuring constant data collection, continuous algorithmic assessment, and possibly infinite record retention. This undermines the traditional intellectual privacy and safety of classrooms. Second, these systems displace pedagogical decision-making from educators serving public interests to private, often for-profit, technology providers. They constrain teachers' academic autonomy, obscure student evaluation, and reduce parents' and students' ability to participate or challenge education decision-making. Third, big data-driven tools define what "counts" as education by mapping the concepts, creating the content, determining the metrics, and setting desired learning outcomes of instruction. These shifts cede important decision-making to private entities without public scrutiny or pedagogical examination. In contrast to the public and heated debates that accompany textbook choices, schools often adopt education technologies ad hoc. Given education's crucial impact on individual and collective success, educators and policymakers must consider the implications of data-driven education proactively and explicitly.

Whose Data? Which Rights? Whose Power? A Policy Discourse Analysis of Student Privacy Policy Documents

Data Privacy: from Transparency to Fairness

Shifting to digital: a policy perspective on ‘Student perceptions of privacy principles for learning analytics’ (Ifenthaler & Schumacher 2016)

Achieving big data privacy in education

A Human-Centered Approach to Data Privacy : Political Economy, Power, and Collective Data Subjects

More Data Types More Problems: A Temporal Analysis of Complexity, Stability, and Sensitivity in Privacy Policies

Educators’ understandings of digital classroom tools and datafication: perceptions from higher education faculty

Smart campus communication, Internet of Things, and data governance: Understanding student tensions and imaginaries

Data and privacy literacy: the role of the school in educating children in a datafied society

SoK: The Gap Between Data Rights Ideals and Reality

How Data Can Be Used Against People: A Classification of Personal Data Misuses

A comparative analysis of data governance: Socio-technical imaginaries of digital personal data in the USA and EU (2008–2016)

The Influence of Policy Regimes on the Development and Social Implications of Privacy Enhancing Technologies

The Structural Consequences of Big Data-Driven Education

Balancing’ privacy and open science in the context of COVID-19: a response to Ifenthaler & Schumacher (2016)

"This is not a data problem": Algorithms and Power in Public Higher Education in Canada

Fair privacy: how college students perceive fair privacy protection in online datasets

Privacy, Practice, and Performance

The future of value in digitalised higher education: why data privacy should not be our biggest concern

Putting Privacy into Perspective -- Comparing Technical, Legal, and Users' View of Data Sensitivity

Student and Staff Perspectives on the Use of Big Data in the Tertiary Education Sector: A Scoping Review and Reflection on the Ethical Issues