The Potential of Iodine and Iron Double-Fortified Salt Compared with Iron-Fortified Staple Foods to Increase Population Iron Status

Richard F Hurrell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxaa204

2021-02-01

Abstract:ABSTRACT The potential of double-fortified salt (DFS) to improve population iron status is compared with the potential of iron-fortified wheat flour, maize flour, rice grains, and milk products. The potential for a positive impact on iron status is based on reported efficacy studies, consumption patterns, the extent of industrialization, and whether there are remaining technical issues with the fortification technologies. Efficacy studies with DFS, and with iron-fortified wheat flour, maize flour, and rice, have all reported good potential to improve population iron status. Iron-fortified milk powder has shown good impact in young children. When these foods are industrially fortified in modern, automated facilities, with high-level quality control and assurance practices, high-quality raw materials, and a wide population coverage, all vehicles have good potential to improve iron status. Relative to other fortification vehicles, fortification practices with wheat flour are the most advanced and iron-fortified wheat flour has the highest potential for impact in the short- to medium-term in countries where wheat flour is consumed as a staple. Liquid milk has the least potential, mainly because an acceptable iron fortification technology has not yet been developed. Maize is still predominantly milled in small-scale local mills and, although the extruded rice premix technology holds great promise, it is still under development. Salt has a proven record as an excellent vehicle for iodine fortification and has demonstrated good potential for iron fortification. However, technical issues remain with DFS and further studies are needed to better understand and avoid color formation and iron-catalyzed iodine losses in both high- and low-quality salts under different storage conditions. There is currently a risk that the introduction of DFS may jeopardize the success of existing salt iodization programs because the addition of iron may increase iodine losses and cause unacceptable color formation.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **Compare the potential of double - fortified salt (DFS) and iron - fortified staple foods (such as wheat flour, corn flour, rice and dairy products) in improving the iron status of the population**. Specifically, the article explores the potential impacts of different iron - fortified foods on iron status, based on existing efficacy studies, consumption patterns, the degree of industrialization and technical issues.

### Main content of the paper

1. **Background introduction**:
- Iron - fortified foods are a key strategy for dealing with iron - deficiency anemia (IDA) and iron deficiency (ID).
- Common iron - fortified carriers include wheat flour, corn flour, rice and dairy products, and now double - fortified salt (DFS) has been added.
- The article compares the potential of DFS and other iron - fortified foods in improving the iron status of the population.

2. **Evaluation basis**:
- Efficacy studies: Based on the efficacy reported in long - term feeding studies, especially the changes in the iron status of women and children.
- Consumption patterns: The consumption of different food carriers nationwide.
- Degree of industrialization: Industrial production in modern automated facilities.
- Technical issues: Technical challenges that may affect the iron - fortification effect, such as sensory changes and iodine loss.

3. **Main conclusions**:
- The iron - fortification technology for wheat flour is the most mature, and iron - fortified wheat flour has the highest potential impact in the short term, especially in countries where wheat flour is the staple food.
- Liquid milk has the lowest potential for iron fortification because no acceptable iron - fortification technology has been developed so far.
- Corn flour is still mainly processed in small local mills, and although the extruded rice premix technology has broad prospects, it is still under development.
- As an excellent iodine - fortification carrier, salt has proven its good iron - fortification potential, but there are also technical problems, such as color change and iodine loss.

4. **Technical issues**:
- The main problems faced by DFS are color change and iron - catalyzed iodine loss, especially under different storage conditions.
- Adding iron may increase the risk of success of existing iodine - fortified salt programs, because the addition of iron may lead to iodine loss and unacceptable color change.

### Formula representation

- **Iron bioavailability formula**:
\[
\text{Iron bioavailability}=\frac{\text{Amount of iron absorbed}}{\text{Amount of iron ingested}}
\]

- **Daily iron requirement**:
\[
\text{Daily iron requirement}=\frac{\text{Estimated average requirement (EAR)}}{\text{Iron bioavailability}}
\]

### Summary

This paper aims to evaluate the potential of double - fortified salt (DFS) in improving the iron status of the population relative to other iron - fortified foods by comparing the efficacy, consumption patterns, degree of industrialization and technical issues of different iron - fortified foods. The research shows that although DFS has potential, there are also some technical challenges that need further research and solution.