Abstract:This study aims to understand the reason(s) for the poor interest in management units by undergraduate engineering students. Data collection was based on the construction of Fishbone diagrams that depicted root causes of the research question, which also reinforced the understanding of continuous improvement and improved response rates. Responses revealed that "perception of engineering" and "nature of contents" were the most dominant root cause groups. Engineering students hardly allocate equal level of engagement to their management units, even when such units are very complex or whether the teacher is from within or outside engineering disciplines, which often reduces student engagement as well as the accomplishments of the entire cohort. Although it is well‐established that the structure, format, and content of units' assessments play vital roles in how much university students interact with their units, there are compelling evidence for and against the efficacy of different assessment methods deployable by educators that teach management units. Therefore, the focus of this study is to ascertain the reason(s) for the subpar interest in management units by engineering students. Data was gathered using Fishbone diagrams (FBDs) that depicted possible root causes of the research question. In addition to data generation, the use of FBDs also enabled deeper understanding of continuous improvement and increased the response rates. Responses showed that "perception of engineering" and "nature of contents" were the most prominent root cause groups. Further observations depicted that the perception of engineering among the students is that of an entirely technical discipline, thereby making science, engineering, technology, and mathematics units the most important. Furthermore, several respondents underrated the contents of management units, due to insufficient alignment with emerging engineering concepts as well as their inadequate academic challenge. To examine the influence of the implemented changes to assessment method on students' achievements, the performance indicators of five different cohorts were compared, and the outcomes of the comparison depicted a consistent pattern of students' attainment. Furthermore, a students' scores match of >95% was observed between cohorts, which so far indicates consistency.

BUILDING THE ENGINEERING MINDSET: DEVELOPING LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT COMPETENCIES IN THE ENGINEERING CURRICULUM

Engineering management: old story, new demands

Leveraging faculty knowledge, experience, and training for leadership education in engineering undergraduate curricula

“We learn things to solve real-life problems”: Understanding how nature of engineering beliefs situate developing pedagogical content knowledge in a modular engineering education professional development program

From STEM to STEAM: Strategies for Enhancing Engineering & Technology Education

Managing Dilemmas Embodied in 21st Century Engineering

Relative importance of professional practice and engineering management competencies

Developing Engineering Leaders of Tomorrow: Engineering Leadership Education in MIT

From problem-based learning to practice-based education: a framework for shaping future engineers

Bringing the Entrepreneurial Mindset into Mining Engineering Education

Cultivating a Culture of Innovation Nurturing Entrepreneurial Spirit and Startup Mindset in Engineering Education

Engineers of the future: student perspectives on integrating global competence in their education

Teaching Engineering Innovation, Design, and Leadership in a Community of Practice

Using an open-ended socio-technical design challenge for entrepreneurship education in a first-year engineering course

Reframing Engineering Design: Integrating Design Thinking and Systems Thinking in Engineering Education and Practice to Address Wicked Problems

Developing an industry‐inspired and engaging interdisciplinary unit for undergraduate engineering students: A depiction of the operations management unit at the University of Manchester

Zooming Out from the Struggling Individual Student: An Account of the Cultural Construction of Engineering Ability in an Undergraduate Programming Class

FROM STEM TO STEAM IN ENGINEERING DESIGN

The Wisdom of the Collective: an Integrated Multi-Level Framework of Shared Leadership in Engineering Management Project Teams

Competency requirements for engineering management undergraduates in the era of intelligent construction

Theories and Practice of American Engineering Leadership Education