Abstract:Background: Although well-designed instruments to assess communication during medical interviews and complex encounters exist, assessment tools that differentiate between communication, empathy, decision-making, and moral judgment are needed to assess different aspects of communication during situations defined by ethical conflict. To address this need, we developed an assessment tool that differentiates competencies associated with practice in ethically challenging situations. The competencies are grouped into three distinct categories: communication skills, civility and respectful behavior, clinical and ethical judgment and decision-making. Objective: The overall objective of this project is to develop an assessment tool for ethically sensitive scenarios that measures the degree of respect for the attitudes and beliefs of patients and family members, the demands of clinical decision-making, and the success in dealing with ethical conflicts in the clinical context. In this article, we describe the research method we will use during the pilot-test study using the neonatal context to provide validity evidence to support the features of the Assessment Communication Tool for Ethics (ACT4Ethics) instrument. Methods: This study is part of a multiphase project designed according to modern validity principles including content, response process, internal structure, relation to other variables, and social consequences. The design considers threats to validity such as construct underrepresentation and factors exerting nonrandom influence on scores. This study consists of two primary steps: (1) train the raters in the use of the new tool and (2) pilot-test a simulation using an Objective Structured Clinical Examination. We aim to obtain a total of 90 independent assessments based on the performance of 30 trainees rated by 15 trained raters for analysis. A comparison of raters' responses will allow us to compute a measure of interrater reliability. We will additionally compare the results of ACT4Ethics with another existing instrument. Results: This study will take approximately 18 months to complete and the results should be available by September 2019. Conclusions: ACT4Ethics should allow clinician-teachers to assess and monitor the development of competency of trainees' judgments and communication skills when facing ethically sensitive clinical situations. The instrument will also guide the provision of meaningful feedback to ensure that trainees develop specific communication, empathy, decision-making, and ethical competencies. International registered report identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/12039.

Moral competence, moral teamwork and moral action - the European Moral Case Deliberation Outcomes (Euro-MCD) Instrument 2.0 and its revision process

Field-testing the Euro-MCD Instrument: Experienced outcomes of moral case deliberation

Defining and categorizing outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation (MCD): concept mapping with experienced MCD participants

Important outcomes of moral case deliberation: a Euro-MCD field survey of healthcare professionals’ priorities

What is a High-Quality Moral Case Deliberation?-Facilitators' Perspectives in the Euro-MCD Project

Developing an ethics support tool for dealing with dilemmas around client autonomy based on moral case deliberations

Dealing with Moral Challenges in Treatment of Transgender Children and Adolescents: Evaluating the Role of Moral Case Deliberation

Fostering moral resilience through moral case deliberation

Learning by doing. Training health care professionals to become facilitator of moral case deliberation

Relational autonomy in the care of the vulnerable: health care professionals’ reasoning in Moral Case Deliberation (MCD)

Evaluating the use of casuistry during moral case deliberation in the ICU: A multiple qualitative case study

Ethical decision-making climate in the ICU: theoretical framework and validation of a self-assessment tool

How to deal with moral challenges around the decision-making competence in transgender adolescent care? Development of an ethics support tool

Working towards implementing moral case deliberation in mental healthcare: Ongoing dialogue and shared ownership as strategy

Testing a Communication Assessment Tool for Ethically Sensitive Scenarios: Protocol of a Validation Study

Impact of clinical decision-making participation and satisfaction on outcomes in mental health practice: results from the CEDAR European longitudinal study

Principle-based structured case discussions: do they foster moral competence in medical students? - A pilot study

MatricS-A novel tool for monitoring professional role development in surgical disciplines

Which instruments are used to measure shared, supported and assisted healthcare decision-making between patients who have limited, impaired or fluctuating capacity, their family carers and healthcare professionals? A systematic review protocol

Measuring healthcare professionals' perceptions of their ability to adopt shared decision making: Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of the IcanSDM questionnaire

Ethical decision-making confidence scale for nurse leaders: Psychometric evaluation