Abstract:OBJECTIVE:Use sagittal reconstruction CT to verify the surgical strategy for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).METHODS:A retrospective study of 161 patients (106 males and 55 females) who had undergone surgery for OPLL from July 2007 to November 2010 was performed. The mean age at surgery was 54.5 years (range from 26 to 77 years). The mean follow-up period was 28 months (12 - 54 months). There were 40 patients accept anterior approach surgeries (anterior group) which include 14 cases of anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion and 26 cases of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. There were 120 patients accept posterior approach surgeries (posterior group) which was spinous process-splitting laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy using coralline hydroxyapatite. One patient accepted combined anterior and posterior approach. According to the sagittal reconstruction CT, the main reason for spinal cord compression was cervical disc herniation in anterior group, and OPLL in posterior group. The level of spinal cord compression was 1 to 2 levels in anterior group, and 1 to 5 levels in posterior group with a major of 2 to 4 levels. As the classification of OPLL, segmental type and circumscribed type were major of segmental type in anterior group and all of the four types were in posterior group, the distribution of each type was average. The patients of posterior group were classified into two groups according to the modified K-line classification, and clinical results were compared between the two groups. The modified K-line was defined as a line that connects the midpoints of the spinal canal at C(2) and C(7) on sagittal CT myelography. Compression to the spinal cord did not exceed the K-line in the modified K-line(+) group and did exceed it in the modified K-line(-) group. Clinical data were compared using t-test or χ(2) test. Correlation analysis was used to determine the relationships of C(2)-C(7) angulation between sagittal reconstruction CT and neutral position X-ray.RESULTS:The patient of anterior group had better recovery rate of the JOA score (72% ± 27%) than the posterior group (59% ± 35%) at the latest follow-up (t = 2.238, P = 0.027). In posterior group, the patients of modified K-line(+) group had better recovery rate of the JOA score (63% ± 37%) than the K-line(-) group (49% ± 30%) at the latest follow up (t = 2.150, P = 0.034). The C(2)-C(7) angulation on sagittal reconstruction CT was 11° ± 9° which has significantly correlated with the C(2)-C(7) angulation on neutral position X-ray which was 10° ± 10° (r = 0.947, P < 0.01).CONCLUSIONS:Considering the selection of surgical approach, it should be combined with the main clinical diagnosis for spinal cord compression, the level of compression, the classification of OPLL and the kyphotic alignment of the cervical spine. The modified K-line is a simple and practical tool for making decisions regarding the surgical strategy for cervical OPLL patients.

Ossification of the cervical anterior longitudinal ligament is an underdiagnosed cause of difficult airway: a case report and review of the literature

Combined upper cervical canal stenosis and cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament resulting in myelopathy: A case series and literature review.

Radiological Manifestations and Surgical Outcome of Combined Upper Cervical Cord Compression and Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

Surgical treatment of 40 patients with thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum.

[Use Sagittal Reconstruction CT for Making Decisions Regarding the Surgical Strategy for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament].

Extended Laminoplasty for Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Involving the C2 Segment

Epidemiological Survey of Ossification of the Ligamentum Flavum in Thoracic Spine: CT Imaging Observation of 993 Cases

Percutaneous Fully-endoscopic Anterior Transcorporeal Procedure for the Treatment of Isolated Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in the Cervical Spine: A Case Report

Epidemiology of Ossification of the Spinal Ligaments and Associated Factors in the Chinese Population: a Cross-Sectional Study of 2000 Consecutive Individuals

A Systematic Review of Complications in Thoracic Spine Surgery for Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

Diagnosis and surgical management of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

An unusual cause of difficult intubation in a patient with a large cervical anterior osteophyte: a case report

Differences in the Demographics and Clinical Characteristics between the Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament and Ossification of the Ligamentum Flavum in Patients Who Underwent Thoracic Spinal Surgery for Compressive Myelopathy

Clinical diagnosis of myelopathy resulted from thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum associated with cervical spondylosis

Choice of surgical approach for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in combination with cervical disc hernia

Potential Link Between Ossification of Nuchal Ligament and the Risk of Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Evidence and Clinical Implication from a Meta‐Analysis of 8429 Participants

Anterior cervical controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion (ACAF) versus Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion (ACCF) for ossification of the cervical posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) in Chinese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ossified Ligamentum Flavum: Epidemiology, Treatment, and Outcomes

A rare case of difficult airway management in a Klippel-Feil syndrome pediatric patient with osseous torticollis undergone orthopedic surgery

Comparison of Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion Versus Laminoplasty in the Treatment of Multisegment Ossification of Cervical Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical

Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in North American Patients: Does Presentation with Spinal Cord Injury Matter?