Autoantibodies to Malondialdehyde–Acetaldehyde Are Detected Prior to Rheumatoid Arthritis Diagnosis and After Other Disease Specific Autoantibodies

Ted R. Mikuls,Jess Edison,Elizabeth Meeshaw,Harlan Sayles,Bryant R. England,Michael J. Duryee,Carlos D. Hunter,Lindsay B. Kelmenson,Laura Kay Moss,Marie L. Feser,Brandie Wagner,Mark C. Parish,Kevin D. Deane,Geoffrey M. Thiele
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.41424
2020-10-15
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Objectives</h3><p>To examine serum autoantibodies to malondialdehyde‐acetaldehyde (MAA) prior to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosis.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>Anti‐MAA antibody isotypes, anti‐CCP2, and RF‐IgM were measured in pre‐ and post‐RA diagnosis samples (n=214 cases, 210 controls). The timing of elevations in autoantibody concentrations relative to RA diagnosis was explored using separate mixed‐models for each antibody and/or isotype. Associations between pre‐diagnosis autoantibody concentrations in cases were examined using mixed effects linear regression models.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>IgG (log2 difference 0.34) and IgA (log2 difference 0.43) anti‐MAA antibody concentrations in cases diverged from controls 3.0 and 2.3 years, respectively, pre‐RA diagnosis (p &lt;0.05). There was no evidence of case‐control divergence for IgM anti‐MAA antibody. Anti‐CCP2 and RF‐IgM concentrations diverged between cases and controls beginning 17.6 and 7.2 years, respectively, prior to RA diagnosis. All three anti‐MAA antibody isotypes were significantly associated with anti‐CCP2 antibody and RF concentrations pre‐diagnosis (β = 0.22‐0.27 for RF‐IgM; β = 0.44‐0.93 for anti‐CCP2; p &lt;0.001).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>IgG and IgA anti‐MAA autoantibodies are elevated pre‐RA diagnosis but appear later in the pre‐clinical course than anti‐CCP2 or RF. These results suggest that MAA formation and anti‐MAA immune responses could have a role in the transition from subclinical autoimmunity to clinically apparent arthritis.</p></section>
rheumatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?