Abstract:This paper examines classroom discourse from English lessons that implemented a critical literacy unit focused on a contextualised social issue. Utilising the theoretical notion of frame, the analysis of classroom excerpts highlights how ideologies about English teaching and learning at times enter the discourse of the classes, not only overtly through the teacher’s talk but also through the more subtle, interactional orchestration of activities. These ideologies, it is argued, pedagogically position the lessons with reference to a procedural, exam-oriented frame, undermining the potential of the content of the talk and the critical literacy unit. Two key implications are drawn from the analysis. First, that in settings with deeply entrenched pedagogic traditions of standards, exam-focused literacy and the attendant instrumentalist view of language education, critical literacy educators may find it helpful to make these ideologies themselves the target of a critical literacy curriculum. Second, it is argued that the notion of frame can be usefully drawn upon in critical analyses of classroom discourse to make visible and understand how ideology as an interpretive framework shapes classroom talk and the learning made possible by that talk.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the challenges faced in implementing critical literacy education in English classrooms in Singapore. Specifically, through frame theory, the author analyzes how the interaction between teachers and students is influenced by deeply - rooted teaching and learning concepts when introducing critical literacy units in English teaching. These concepts mainly originate from the cultural background of exam - oriented education, which emphasizes procedural and instrumental teaching methods, thus weakening the potential effectiveness of critical literacy courses to a certain extent. The paper explores how to effectively implement critical literacy education in this context and proposes the importance of taking these deeply - rooted concepts themselves as one of the goals of critical literacy education. In addition, the paper also discusses the application value of frame theory in classroom discourse analysis, especially how to reveal and understand how ideology is reflected and shaped in classroom interaction through this theory.
### Main problems
1. **Challenges in implementing critical literacy education in the culture of exam - oriented education**: The paper explores how to overcome the limitations of the culture of exam - oriented education on critical literacy education in an environment like Singapore.
2. **The influence of ideology in classroom interaction**: By analyzing the interaction between teachers and students, it reveals how deeply - rooted teaching and learning concepts are manifested in the classroom and affect teaching effectiveness.
3. **The application of frame theory**: It explores the application of frame theory in classroom discourse analysis and how to better understand the mutual construction of social structures and local contexts in the classroom through this theory.
### Key concepts
- **Frame**: According to Goffman's definition, a frame refers to the shared situational definition among participants in a specific situation, which determines how to interpret and understand behaviors and speeches in the interaction.
- **Production Format**: A concept proposed by Goffman for analyzing the production process of discourse, including three roles: animator, author, and principal.
- **Participation Structure**: Refers to who has the right to speak in the classroom, in what way to speak, and about what content to speak, etc. These structures fundamentally affect the learning process and the construction of knowledge.
### Conclusion
Through a detailed analysis of classroom interaction, the paper reveals how the ideology in the culture of exam - oriented education is reflected in the classroom and proposes the necessity of taking these ideologies themselves as one of the goals of critical literacy education. At the same time, the paper emphasizes the importance of frame theory in classroom discourse analysis, providing a new perspective for understanding the social structure and local context in the classroom.