Impact of Mobile Neurofeedback on Internet Addiction and Neurocognitive Function in Neurotypical Children: Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.s454881
IF: 2.989
2024-05-18
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Abstract:Jae-Won Choi, 1, &ast Seungheon Yang, 2, &ast Jun Won Kim 2 1 Department of Psychiatry, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Republic of Korea; 2 Department of Psychiatry, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Jun Won Kim, Department of Psychiatry, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, 3056-6 Daemyeong-4 dong, Nam-gu, Daegu, 705-718, Republic of Korea, Tel +82-53-650-4786, Fax +82-53-623-1694, Email Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the positive impact of mobile neurofeedback (MNF) in neurotypical children compared to sham mobile neurofeedback. Methods: Neurotypical children aged 10– 15 participated in the study. All subjects were assessed using the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia Present and Lifetime Version Korean Version (K-SADS-PL-K) and confirmed to have no psychiatric symptoms. The participants were randomly assigned to the MNF active (N=31) or sham control (N=30) groups. The MNF program was administered using a mobile app for 30 min/day, 3 days/week, for 3 months. All participants and their parents completed self-report scales and participants complete neurocognitive function assessments including the continuous performance test, Stroop, children's color trails test-1 and 2, and intelligence test at baseline and after the 3-month MNF program. Results: This study involved 61 participants (mean [SD] age, 11.24 [1.84] years; 30 male participants [49.2%]). To verify the difference between the MNF group and the sham group, 2(MNF-Sham) X 2(Pre-Post) repeated measures ANOVA was performed. The main effect of the K-scale (Korea Internet addiction scale) between-group factor (MNF vs Sham) was not significant, but the main effect of the within-group factor (Pre vs Post) was significant (F=7.595, p=0.008). The interaction effect of between-group factors and within-group factors was also significant (F=5.979, p=0.017). In other self-reported scales of children and parents and neurocognitive function assessments, there was no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: Active mobile neurofeedback significantly improved children's K-scale score compared to the sham group. Therefore, mobile neurofeedback could be an easy-to-access therapeutic option for children at risk of Internet addiction. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in other scales and neurocognitive function. A 3-month intervention may not have been long enough to cause change, so longer interventions are needed for confirmation. Keywords: mobile neurofeedback, double-blind randomized clinical trial, neurotypical children, internet addiction Neurofeedback is a non-invasive therapeutic approach, a subtype of biofeedback, where patients learn to self-regulate their brainwaves by perceiving them through monitoring equipment. This method empowers patients to control their brainwave patterns as intended through training. 1 Patients' brainwave patterns are transformed into immediate visual or auditory feedback, such as sounds or animations, allowing them to receive real-time information about their brainwave states. By receiving appropriate rewards and undergoing repetitive learning, patients become proficient in regulating their brainwaves. This approach is rooted in theories of operant conditioning and other learning effects. 2 Through such learning effects, neurofeedback training induces neuroplasticity, preventing pathological synaptic strength or oscillatory states from occurring in the brain. Furthermore, it is based on the fundamental principle that by promoting normalization of brain activity and self-regulation, it can lead to improved cognitive and behavioral control in children with ADHD who may be lacking in these aspects. The most extensively studied psychiatric disorder in which neurofeedback has been widely applied is Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). ADHD is characterized by core symptoms, including inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. Children with ADHD are known to exhibit deficits in executive functions, such as working memory, inhibitory control, and planning, in addition to these core symptoms, as compared to typically developing children. 3 In addition to pharmacological treatment, non-pharmacological approaches such as psychiatric education, behavioral parent training (BPT), cognitive behavioral therapy, and social skills training programs can also be used to treat ADHD. 4 Neurofeedback has been proposed as a prominent alternative in this context, garnering ongoing attention from researchers. An advantage -Abstract Truncated-
psychiatry,clinical neurology