Abstract:We explore the vicious cycle of bias on the Web related to search and recommender systems. The first bias is activity bias [1], called by Nielsen participation inequality in Internet [3]. This means that when sampling content, data will have many different types of bias such as gender, language, topic, etc. During the design and implementation of the system, biases might be added, and we call those the true algorithmic bias. In addition, when evaluating the system we may have been biased and hence that may also be reflected in algorithmic bias. The design of the interaction also matters, adding several other biases. All of them affect the data that is gathered for optimizing and personalizing the system [1]. Finally, our own cognitive biases also taint the interaction data, including confirmation bias and other behavioral biases. In all these cases we may need to debias the input data, to use techniques that can handle biased data (e.g., machine learning algorithms tailored for that), or debias the output (when we have already lost information). Most systems are optimized by using implicit user feedback, that is, clicks or other trackable user interactions. However, those interactions are biased to the choices that such systems offer to their users, as clicks can only be done on things that are shown to us. Hence, these feedback loops are tainted by presentation or exposure bias [1]. The most well-known problem related to this bias is called the filter bubble [4] or the echo chamber effect. Solutions to this problem include the explore and exploit paradigm (e.g., learning the world), diversity, novelty, and serendipity. Depending on the exploration technique, the bubble is smaller or bigger [2]. On the other hand, too much exploration also reduces short-term revenue and hence is usually bounded. However, we believe that recommender systems could improve their long-term revenue if significantly more exploration is performed, probably diminishing at the same time the tension between user experience and monetization. This is good for the recommender system but also creates more fair and healthy digital markets for everyone, users and publishers/sellers.

Hands on Data and Algorithmic Bias in Recommender Systems

Bias Issues and Solutions in Recommender System: Tutorial on the RecSys 2021

Tutorial on Fairness of Machine Learning in Recommender Systems

Bias in Search and Recommender Systems

A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research

Transparency, Privacy, and Fairness in Recommender Systems

Bias Disparity in Collaborative Recommendation: Algorithmic Evaluation and Comparison

Modeling and Counteracting Exposure Bias in Recommender Systems

On the challenges of studying bias in Recommender Systems: A UserKNN case study

Exploring and Mitigating Gender Bias in Recommender Systems with Explicit Feedback

The multisided complexity of fairness in recommender systems

A Fairness-aware Hybrid Recommender System

Exploring and mitigating gender bias in book recommender systems with explicit feedback

Exploring User Opinions of Fairness in Recommender Systems

The Importance of Cognitive Biases in the Recommendation Ecosystem

Advances in Recommender Systems

Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluation

User-oriented Fairness in Recommendation

Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directions

Interactive Counterfactual Exploration of Algorithmic Harms in Recommender Systems