Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the performance implications of two major mechanisms for organizational learning (i.e. exploration and exploitation). Exploration refers to firm activities that explore new and novel knowledge, whereas exploitation reflects the extent to which a firm reuses its existing knowledge. The authors predict curvilinear (i.e. an inverted U-shape) relationships between exploration/exploitation and firm performance, respectively. That is, firm performance first increases with exploration/exploitation at a decreasing rate; then, firm performance decreases at an increasing rate after firm performance reaches a maximum point. Furthermore, the authors examine whether the curvilinear relationships are moderated by two types of firm–stakeholder relationships (i.e. firm–employee and firm–customer relationships). Design/methodology/approach Using the data from National Bureau of Economic Research, US Patent Citations Data File, KLD Research and Analytics Inc. and Compustat series, the authors construct an unbalanced panel data set of 3,070 observations in 554 firms from 1991 to 2006. To test the hypotheses, feasible generalized least squares regression is used. Findings In consistent with the prediction, the authors find inverted U-shape relationships between exploration/exploitation and firm performance. The authors also find that the curvilinear relationships are moderated by firm–employee relationships. The relationships between exploration/exploitation and firm performance become stronger when firms have better relationships with employees. Research limitations/implications The study provides empirical evidence that better firm–employee relationships can strengthen the curvilinear relationships between exploration/exploitation and firm performance. The authors argue that future studies should extend to other stakeholder relationships, using more refined measures, and incorporating the concept of ambidexterity. Practical implications The findings suggest that managers should design innovation strategy based on performance implications of exploration/exploitation and that managers should also realize that stakeholder relationships can influence the relationships between exploration/exploitation and firm performance. First, the study shows that although exploration and exploitation can improve firm performance, too much exploration or exploitation is not good for firm performance. Therefore, managers should consider seriously the maximum point of performance that exploration and exploitation can reach and avoid too much exploration or exploitation. Second, firms can invest in firm–employee relationships to gain better performance implications from exploration/exploitation. The study shows that, as firms develop better firm–employee relationship, the relationships between exploration/exploitation and firm performance are stronger and firm performance is likely to reach a higher apex. Originality/value The authors find the inverted U-shape relationships between exploration/exploitation and firm performance, moreover, the authors add two contingent factors associated with stakeholders that can help exploration and exploitation contribute more to firm performance.

Are firms like fair-weathered fans? Examining decision-making in B2B relationships

Searching for the "Holy Grail" of sponsorship-linked marketing: A generalizable sponsorship ROI model

The Long Reach of Sponsorship: How Fan Isolation and Identification Jointly Shape Sponsorship Performance

Can Sports Sponsorship Affect Consumers’ Motivation for Sports Consumption?

When sports sponsorship incurs brand risk: the roles of team performance, brand familiarity and team identification

For the Money or the Thrill of the Game: The Financial Performance of National Basketball Association Arena Sponsors

A Research On The Factors Influencing The Outcomes Of Sports Sponsorship

Sponsorship‐linked marketing: a set of research propositions

Benchmarking Sports Sponsorship Performance: Efficiency Assessment With Data Envelopment Analysis

Sponsor effectiveness and its impact on League of Legends fan buying attitude

Drivers of soccer fan loyalty: Australian evidence on the influence of team brand image, fan engagement, satisfaction and enduring involvement

When fan engagement with sports club brands matters in sponsorship: influence of fan–brand personality congruence

The Role of Team-Sponsor Logo Color Congruity in Sponsorship Effectiveness: An Abstract

Drivers of brand image improvement in sports-event sponsorship

Examining valuation of corporate naming rights partnerships in collegiate sports and their impact on consumer behavior

Do stakeholder relationships matter? An empirical study of exploration, exploitation and firm performance

Sponsorship congruence and brand image

Attachment points, team identification and sponsorship outcomes: evidence from the Indian Premier League

When Sports Fans Buy: Contextualizing Social Media Engagement Behavior to Predict Purchase Intention

The Evaluation of Sports Sponsorships

Rival team effects in cause-related sports marketing