Abstract:Purpose: This study aims to address the critical mental health challenges faced by individuals in prisons and places of detention. By introducing and validating a novel conceptual framework that integrates social determinants of health with the stress process model, this study aims to provide actionable insights for improving mental health care in correctional settings. The research seeks to inform policymakers, prison administrators and mental health professionals about effective interventions and systemic reforms that can reduce recidivism, enhance rehabilitation and promote a more humane and just criminal justice system. Design/methodology/approach: This study uses a multi-method research design integrating a systematic literature review, qualitative interviews, multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) and a small-scale empirical study within a correctional facility. The systematic review follows PRISMA guidelines, analysing peer-reviewed articles, government reports and policy documents. Semi-structured interviews with 25 mental health professionals provide practical insights, whereas the MCE assesses intervention effectiveness based on expert consensus. The empirical study involves baseline assessments, intervention implementation and follow-up evaluations using validated tools, providing robust data to validate the proposed conceptual framework that integrates social determinants of health with the stress process model. Findings: This study finds that mental health disorders are significantly more prevalent in prison populations than in the general population, with interventions like cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), peer support programs and trauma-informed care showing considerable effectiveness in reducing symptoms. Emerging technologies such as AI and telemedicine present promising avenues for enhancing care but require careful ethical consideration. The research also highlights the critical role of social determinants and the importance of systemic reforms, such as reducing solitary confinement and integrating prison health care with broader public health systems, in improving inmate mental health and reducing recidivism. Research limitations/implications: This study's quasi-experimental design, while robust, may limit the generalizability of the findings to other correctional settings because of specific facility characteristics. Additionally, the sample size for qualitative interviews, although diverse, could have been larger to provide more nuanced insights, particularly for underrepresented groups. This study highlights the need for more longitudinal research to assess the long-term effects of interventions and the scalability of approaches across different cultural and legal contexts. Future studies should address these limitations by using more diverse sampling, larger sample sizes and extended follow-up periods. Practical implications: This study provides actionable insights for policymakers and prison administrators, emphasizing the need to integrate evidence-based mental health interventions, such as CBT and trauma-informed care, into prison reform strategies. It highlights the importance of training correctional staff in mental health first aid and the potential of emerging technologies like AI and telemedicine to enhance care delivery in resource-limited settings. Implementing these recommendations could significantly improve inmate mental health outcomes, reduce recidivism rates and promote a more humane and effective correctional system, with broader benefits for public health and social equity. Social implications: Improving mental health care in prisons has significant social implications, particularly in promoting social justice and reducing inequalities. Effective mental health interventions can help break the cycle of incarceration and recidivism, particularly in marginalized communities disproportionately affected by the criminal justice system. By addressing the mental health needs of incarcerated individuals, society can foster safer communities, reduce crime rates and alleviate the economic burden on the criminal justice and health-care systems. Furthermore, enhancing mental health care in prisons reflects a commitment to human dignity, fairness and the rehabilitation of offenders, contributing to a more just and compassionate society. Originality/value: This study introduces a novel conceptual framework that integrates social determinants of health with the stress process model, specifically tailored for correctional facilities. It provides original empirical data from a real-world prison setting, offering new insights into the effectiveness of mental health interventions, such as CBT and trauma-informed care. The study's value lies in its comprehensive approach, combining quantitative and qualitative methods, and its focus on underrepresented populations in correctional settings. By addressing significant gaps in the literature, this research offers practical recommendations for policymakers and practitioners, contributing to improved mental health outcomes and reduced recidivism.

Considering the Use of the Term ‘Rehab Potential’ within in-patient Mental Health Services: Its Usefulness and the Risks Associated with Getting it Wrong—A Theoretical Perspective

Rehabilitation for adults with an intellectual disability and mental health and behavioural complexities: A scoping review

The relationship between community-based psychiatric rehabilitation pathways and re-hospitalization trajectories: A three-decade follow-up

Staff Expectations of an Australian Integrated Model of Residential Rehabilitation for People With Severe and Persisting Mental Illness: A Pragmatic Grounded Theory Analysis

Barriers and Enablers for Accessing Rehabilitation Services: Findings From the Rehabilitation Choices Study, Part 1—Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives

Contemporary approaches in mental health rehabilitation

What is rehabilitation? An empirical investigation leading to an evidence-based description

THE OFFENDER PERSONALITY DISORDER PATHWAY: RISKING REHABILITATION?

Too risky to use, or too risky not to? Lessons learned from over 30 years of research on forensic risk assessment with Indigenous persons.

Contributing to 'a sense of purpose' – Evaluating consumer recovery progress after attending a therapeutic-recreation intervention programme: A quantitative analysis

Contribution of socio-demographic and clinical characteristics to predict initial referrals to psychosocial interventions in patients with serious mental illness

Services Addressing Mental Health Needs of Youth in Physical Rehabilitation: Perspectives of Clinicians, Youth and Family Members

Assessing the safety of physical rehabilitation in critically ill patients: a Delphi study

Predictors of Hospital Readmission, Institutionalization, and Mortality in Geriatric Rehabilitation Following Hospitalization According to Admission Reason

Rehabilitating antisocial personalities: treatment through self-governance strategies

Staff Perceptions of Mental Health Relapse Prevention Support in a Specialist Mental Health Service in an Intellectual Disability Setting

"I'm still in the lap of the gods... I don't know whether I'm going to improve or not": listening to people with dementia or cognitive impairment and their support people, talking about inpatient rehabilitation experiences

Governing neurorehabilitation

Patients' experiences with early rehabilitation in intensive care units: A qualitative study about aspects that influence their participation

Mental health and well-being in prisons and places of detention

Opting out of cardiac rehabilitation in local community healthcare services: Patients' perspectives and reflections