Abstract:Importance: Communication and adoption of modern study design and analytical techniques is of high importance for the improvement of clinical research from observational data. Objective: To compare a modern method for statistical inference, including a target trial emulation framework and doubly robust estimation, with approaches common in the clinical literature, such as Cox proportional hazards models. Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study used longitudinal electronic health record data for outcomes at 28-days from time of hospitalization within a multicenter New York, New York, hospital system. Participants included adult patients hospitalized between March 1 and May 15, 2020, with COVID-19 and not receiving corticosteroids for chronic use. Data were analyzed from October 2021 to March 2022. Exposures: Corticosteroid exposure was defined as more than 0.5 mg/kg methylprednisolone equivalent in a 24-hour period. For target trial emulation, exposures were corticosteroids for 6 days if and when a patient met criteria for severe hypoxia vs no corticosteroids. For approaches common in clinical literature, treatment definitions used for variables in Cox regression models varied by study design (no time frame, 1 day, and 5 days from time of severe hypoxia). Main outcomes and measures: The main outcome was 28-day mortality from time of hospitalization. The association of corticosteroids with mortality for patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 was assessed using the World Health Organization (WHO) meta-analysis of corticosteroid randomized clinical trials as a benchmark. Results: A total of 3298 patients (median [IQR] age, 65 [53-77] years; 1970 [60%] men) were assessed, including 423 patients who received corticosteroids at any point during hospitalization and 699 patients who died within 28 days of hospitalization. Target trial emulation analysis found corticosteroids were associated with a reduced 28-day mortality rate, from 32.2%; (95% CI, 30.9%-33.5%) to 25.7% (95% CI, 24.5%-26.9%). This estimate is qualitatively identical to the WHO meta-analysis odds ratio of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.53-0.82). Hazard ratios using methods comparable with current corticosteroid research range in size and direction, from 0.50 (95% CI, 0.41-0.62) to 1.08 (95% CI, 0.80-1.47). Conclusions and relevance: These findings suggest that clinical research based on observational data can be used to estimate findings similar to those from randomized clinical trials; however, the correctness of these estimates requires designing the study and analyzing the data based on principles that are different from the current standard in clinical research.

The competing risk between in-hospital mortality and recovery: A pitfall in COVID-19 survival analysis research

Competing Risks in Clinical Trials: Do They Matter and How Should We Account for Them?

Competing Risk Survival analysis of time to in-hospital mortality or Recovery among Covid-19 Patients in South-East Ethiopia: a hospital-based multisite study

Comparison of in-hospital mortality risk prediction models from COVID-19

Comparison of a Target Trial Emulation Framework to Cox Regression to Estimate the Effect of Corticosteroids on COVID-19 Mortality

Comparison of a Target Trial Emulation Framework vs Cox Regression to Estimate the Association of Corticosteroids With COVID-19 Mortality

Methodological biases in observational hospital studies of COVID-19 treatment effectiveness: pitfalls and potential

Abstract 58: Socioeconomically Driven Reversal of Mortality Trends Among Patients With Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of Nationally Representative Data

Clinical Risk Factors for Mortality of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mortality outcomes with hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19 from an international collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials

Approximate Reciprocal Relationship Between Two Cause-Specific Hazard Ratios in COVID-19 Data with Mutually Exclusive Events.

Prognostic model to identify and quantify risk factors for mortality among hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in the USA

Predictive Models of Mortality for Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: Retrospective Cohort Study

Learning accurate personalized survival models for predicting hospital discharge and mortality of COVID-19 patients

Identifying Key Clinical Indicators Associated with the Risk of Death in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on in-hospital mortality in cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis

Predictive determinants of overall survival among re-infected COVID-19 patients using the elastic-net regularized Cox proportional hazards model: a machine-learning algorithm

Mortality and Survival Analysis in COVID-19 Patients: Hematological and Biochemical Study

Development of a Model for Predicting Mortality Among Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 During Their Stay in a Clinical Centre

STUDY ON THE RISK OF DEATH OF COAGULATION INDEX IN PATIENTS WITH COVID-19

Myocardial Injury and Risk Factors for Mortality in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia.