Boundary Conditions of the Ethical Leadership and Work Meaningfulness Relationship
Haoying Xu,Chenduo Du,Yuqi Zhang,Yuying Lin,Zhen Wang,Xiao Jia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2017.16265abstract
2017-01-01
Academy of Management Proceedings
Abstract:Despite urgent calls for more research on the integration of business ethics and the meaning of work, to date, there have been few corresponding efforts, and we know surprisingly little about this relationship. In this study, we address this issue by examining when and for whom ethical leadership is more or less effective in promoting among employees a sense of work meaningfulness, and their subsequent work attitudes. Drawing on the contingency theories of leadership and work meaningfulness literature, we speculate that both employees core self-evaluation (CSE; as a dispositional characteristic) and perceived organizational support (POS; as a situational characteristic) moderate the relationship, but in different ways, and that these associations carry over to employees subsequent work attitudes in terms of job satisfaction, organizational commitment and turnover intention. We tested our hypotheses with two-wave survey data collected from 377 employees. Results indicated that ethical leadership was effective in eliciting work meaningfulness and attitudes for employees higher in CSE or when POS was lower, and ineffective for those lower in CSE or when POS was higher. Further, supplementary analysis revealed a three-way interaction between ethical leadership, CSE, and POS in predicting a sense of work meaningfulness and subsequent work attitudes. Our research cautions that ethical leadership is not a universally positive practice; it might be ineffective or even have a negative impact under some circumstances.