Stepan Vesely,Christian A. Klöckner
Abstract:That social desirability might be a confounder of people's survey responses regarding environmental actions has been discussed for a long time. To produce evidence for or against this assumption, we conducted meta-analyses of correlations between social desirability scales and self-reports of environmentally relevant behaviors, intentions, and (broadly defined) attitudes, based on data from 29 previously published papers. The pooled correlations with social desirability are generally small, ranging from 0.06 to 0.11 (0.08–0.13 when correcting for measurement error attenuation). However, our results do not lead to the conclusion that social desirability can be completely disregarded by environmental psychologists as a potential confounder. For example, we found evidence of substantial heterogeneity across studies, so the effect of social desirability may be more pronounced in specific cases. Continued attention to social desirability bias is needed to fully understand its possible subtle effects.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **To what extent does the social desirability effect influence self - reported pro - environmental behaviors, intentions and attitudes in environmental psychology research?**
Specifically, the paper explored the correlations between social desirability and self - reported pro - environmental behaviors, intentions and attitudes through three meta - analyses. The social desirability effect refers to the fact that participants distort the truth, either intentionally or unintentionally, in order to create a more positive social image when answering survey questions. This effect may influence the reliability and validity of environmental psychology research.
### Main questions:
1. **Does social desirability constitute an interfering factor in environmental behavior research?**
- The paper attempts to assess the influence of the social desirability effect on environmental behavior research, especially whether it will systematically affect people's reports of their own pro - environmental behaviors, intentions and attitudes.
2. **How large is the specific influence of the social desirability effect?**
- Through meta - analysis, the paper quantified the magnitude of the correlations between social desirability and self - reported pro - environmental behaviors, intentions and attitudes, and evaluated the statistical significance of these correlations.
3. **How is the heterogeneity among different studies?**
- The paper also explored whether there is significant heterogeneity among different studies, that is, whether the social desirability effect is more obvious in certain specific situations.
### Research background:
- Most studies on people's environmental behaviors and their antecedents and consequences are conducted through questionnaires, in which people self - report social - psychological variables such as their actions, beliefs, and attitudes.
- For morally significant behaviors (such as pro - environmental behaviors), people may be inclined to give answers that are more in line with social expectations in order to obtain a better social impression, which may lead to biases in research results.
### Conclusions:
- The results of meta - analysis show that the correlations between social desirability and self - reported pro - environmental behaviors, intentions and attitudes are generally small, but still statistically significant.
- Although the effect size is small, the researchers still suggest that environmental psychologists should not ignore the social desirability effect, especially when designing and interpreting research, they should consider its potential influence.
### Method overview:
- **Inclusion criteria**: The research must be published in scientific journals or edited books, must include at least one measurement related to environmental behavior, intention or attitude, and must include a measurement of social desirability.
- **Literature search**: Multiple strategies (such as database search, full - text scanning, citation tracking, etc.) are used to identify relevant literature.
- **Data analysis**: Three independent meta - analyses were carried out, respectively for pro - environmental behaviors, intentions and attitudes, to ensure the independence of observations, and the corrected correlations were calculated.
### Summary:
This paper provides reliable conclusions about the influence of the social desirability effect on environmental psychology research through a systematic evaluation of existing evidence. Although the effect size is small, the researchers suggest that in environmental psychology research, continuous attention should be paid to and the social desirability effect should be controlled in order to improve the internal validity of the research.