Abstract:BACKGROUND For the clinical care of patients with well-established diseases, randomized trials, literature, and research are supplemented with clinical judgment to understand disease prognosis and inform treatment choices. In the void created by a lack of clinical experience with COVID-19, artificial intelligence (AI) may be an important tool to bolster clinical judgment and decision making. However, a lack of clinical data restricts the design and development of such AI tools, particularly in preparation for an impending crisis or pandemic. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to develop and test the feasibility of a “patients-like-me” framework to predict the deterioration of patients with COVID-19 using a retrospective cohort of patients with similar respiratory diseases. METHODS Our framework used COVID-19–like cohorts to design and train AI models that were then validated on the COVID-19 population. The COVID-19–like cohorts included patients diagnosed with bacterial pneumonia, viral pneumonia, unspecified pneumonia, influenza, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) at an academic medical center from 2008 to 2019. In total, 15 training cohorts were created using different combinations of the COVID-19–like cohorts with the ARDS cohort for exploratory purposes. In this study, two machine learning models were developed: one to predict invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) within 48 hours for each hospitalized day, and one to predict all-cause mortality at the time of admission. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. We established model interpretability by calculating SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) scores to identify important features. RESULTS Compared to the COVID-19–like cohorts (n=16,509), the patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (n=159) were significantly younger, with a higher proportion of patients of Hispanic ethnicity, a lower proportion of patients with smoking history, and fewer patients with comorbidities ( P <.001). Patients with COVID-19 had a lower IMV rate (15.1 versus 23.2, P =.02) and shorter time to IMV (2.9 versus 4.1 days, P <.001) compared to the COVID-19–like patients. In the COVID-19–like training data, the top models achieved excellent performance (AUROC>0.90). Validating in the COVID-19 cohort, the top-performing model for predicting IMV was the XGBoost model (AUROC=0.826) trained on the viral pneumonia cohort. Similarly, the XGBoost model trained on all 4 COVID-19–like cohorts without ARDS achieved the best performance (AUROC=0.928) in predicting mortality. Important predictors included demographic information (age), vital signs (oxygen saturation), and laboratory values (white blood cell count, cardiac troponin, albumin, etc). Our models had class imbalance, which resulted in high negative predictive values and low positive predictive values. CONCLUSIONS We provided a feasible framework for modeling patient deterioration using existing data and AI technology to address data limitations during the onset of a novel, rapidly changing pandemic.

Prognostic Modeling of COVID-19 Using Artificial Intelligence in the United Kingdom: Model Development and Validation

Identification of Risk Factors for Mortality Associated with COVID-19

Peer Review #1 of "identification of Risk Factors for Mortality Associated with COVID-19 (V0.1)"

Learning From Past Respiratory Infections to Predict COVID-19 Outcomes: Retrospective Study

Learning From Past Respiratory Infections to Predict COVID-19 Outcomes: Retrospective Study (Preprint)

Development and Validation of a Scoring System to Predict the Mortality of Hospitalized Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron: a Nationwide, Multicentre Study

Clinical Predictive Models for COVID-19: Systematic Study

Machine Learning Based Clinical Decision Support System for Early COVID-19 Mortality Prediction

Predictive Models of Mortality for Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: Retrospective Cohort Study

Machine learning algorithms for predicting determinants of COVID-19 mortality in South Africa

Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model Based on Immune Variables to Early Predict Severe Cases of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Infection

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Based Prediction of Mortality, for COVID-19 Patients

Identification and Validation of Prognostic Factors in Patients with COVID-19: A Retrospective Study Based on Artificial Intelligence Algorithms

Identification of Variable Importance for Predictions of Mortality From COVID-19 Using AI Models for Ontario, Canada

An Ensemble Prediction Model for COVID-19 Mortality Risk

A Deep Learning Prognosis Model Help Alert for COVID-19 Patients at High-Risk of Death: A Multi-Center Study

An Intelligent System for Prediction of Severity of SARS-Cov-2 Infection and Progression to Critical Illness: Using Machine Learning Models

A Data Driven Approach for Automated Risk Assessment and Survival Prediction of Coronavirus Using Artificial Neural Networks

Using Automated Machine Learning to Predict the Mortality of Patients With COVID-19: Prediction Model Development Study

Development and validation of a machine learning-based prediction model for near-term in-hospital mortality among patients with COVID-19

Optimal Prognostic Accuracy: Machine Learning Approaches for COVID-19 Prognosis with Biomarkers and Demographic Information