Abstract:e13535 Background: More than 90% of head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors experience secondary head and neck lymphedema. Prompt identification and treatment are essential given the progressive nature of lymphedema and potential complications. Usual care includes complete decongestive therapy performed by a lymphedema therapist followed by lifelong home self-care. The ability to participate in lymphedema therapy (LT) is deleteriously impacted by numerous barriers. We are conducting a phase 3 multisite randomized trial involving HNC survivors with treatment-naïve lymphedema which compares usual lymphedema care to the use of an advanced pneumatic compression device (APCD). For patients treated on the usual care arm, data pertaining to LT delivery was collected prospectively. Herein we report the preliminary analysis from this dataset. Methods: Eligible patients were age ≥18 years, had pathologically confirmed HNC, completed curative intent cancer therapy with no evidence of active cancer, were diagnosed with internal or external head and neck lymphedema with at least one core lymphedema associated symptom and had not previously received treatment for lymphedema. Participants were randomized to either usual care with complete decongestive therapy directed by a lymphedema therapist followed by home self-care or daily self-directed use of APCD. Anatomic measurements and patient reported outcome measures were obtained at 2-, 4- and 6-month endpoints. The intervention phase lasted 6 months and therapy records were received for analysis. Key outcome measures included the time from referral to LT evaluation consultation, time from LT evaluation to treatment session and time from referral to treatment session. Results: At the time of this analysis, 87 participants randomized to usual care arm were eligible for inclusion in this assessment. Of the 87 patients, we were unable to document completion of LT consultation or therapy for 39 patients. Among the 48 participants who were referred for LT and received therapy, 72% were male and 28% were female, with 91% identifying as white, 7% as black, and 2% as other. The average age was 62. The mean time from referral by a health care provider to initial lymphedema consultation was 19.6 (σ 18.1) days. Of note, there was a wide-ranging timeframe from referral to LT treatment, varying from 0 to 93 days. The mean time from consultation to treatment was 1.7 days (σ 5.1) and referral to treatment was 21.3 (σ 17.8). Conclusions: A key finding of this study is the high rate (45%) of those referred for LT were not documented to complete a therapy consultation or to receive therapy. Of those patients who receive therapy, consultation and treatment were delay significantly in a high percentage of patients. These finding highlight the need for additional investigation into barriers to timely implementation of LT for head and neck cancer survivors. Guidelines and standards of care should be developed to guide practitioners. Clinical trial information: NCT04797390 .

Comparing the prevalence, location, and severity of head and neck lymphedema after postoperative radiotherapy for oral cavity cancers and definitive chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal, laryngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancers

Clinical, Pathologic, and Dosimetric Predictors of Head and Neck Lymphedema Following Definitive or Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer

Patient-reported outcome measures and physical function following head and neck lymphedema - a systematic review

A prospective observational cohort study examining the development of head and neck lymphedema from the time of diagnosis

Prognostic Factors and Outcomes Associated With Neck Lymphedema in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors

Evaluating the effects of lymphoedema management strategies on functional status and health-related quality of life following treatment for head and neck cancer: a systematic review

Internal Lymphedema Response to A Single Session of External Advanced Pneumatic Compression in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors

Rehabilitation Interventions for Head and Neck Cancer-Associated Lymphedema: A Systematic Review

Timeframe for lymphedema therapy for head and neck cancer survivors.

Functional swallowing outcomes related to radiation exposure to dysphagia and aspiration-related structures in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing definitive and postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Clinical Effect of Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Resected Advanced Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Lymphedema of the Head and Neck-Where Do We Stand and Where We Are Headed

Head and Neck Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Therapeutic Benefit of Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Nodal Disease

Evaluating Observer Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of CT-LEFAT Criteria for Post-Treatment Head and Neck Lymphedema: A Prospective Blinded Comparative Analysis of Oncologist Human Inter-Rater Performance

Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: an Individual Patient Data Network Meta-Analysis

Managing lymphoedema following treatment for head and neck cancer: is complete decongestive therapy an effective intervention to improve dysphagia outcomes?

Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of newly diagnosed locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC): A retrospective cohort analysis of national real-world data in England.

Under recognition and treatment of lymphedema in head and neck cancer survivors – a database study

Lymphedema and Trismus after Head and Neck Cancer, and the Impact on Body Image and Quality of Life

Beyond complete remission: A comparative analysis of long‐term laryngeal function in patients with hypopharyngeal and laryngeal cancer following radiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiation

A Pre-clinical Animal Model of Secondary Head and Neck Lymphedema