4579 Distinct clinical and immunological responses to αPD-1, kαPD-L1 and αPD-L2 immunotherapy in B16 melanoma in aged versus young hosts includes T-cell stem cell effects and PD-L2 expression differences

Myrna G Garcia,Alvaro Padron,Yilun Deng,Harshita Gupta,Aravind Kancharla,Ryan Reyes,Tyler Curiel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.63
2020-06-01
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Abstract:OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Aging is the biggest risk factor for cancer, yet little is known about cancer immunotherapy effects. Here we investigate melanoma response to αPD-1, αPD-L1 and αPD-L2 in young vs. aged hosts. We look at different immune outcomes as possible mechanism. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We tested αPD-1 (100 μg/mouse), αPD-L1 (100 μg/mouse) or αPD-L2 (200 μg/mouse) in aged (18-24 months) and young (3-8 months) mice challenged orthotopically with B16. Tumors and draining lymph nodes (TDLN) were analyzed by flow. Bone marrow-derived DC were generated with GM-CSF. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We reported that αPD-1 treats young and aged with B16 and αPD-L1 only treats young. aPD-L2 treated B16 in aged but, remarkably, not young, the first anti-cancer single agent immunotherapy exhibiting this property. Efficacy in young (aPD-1, aPD-L1) and aged (aPD-1, aPD-L2) correlated with increased T cell stem cells (TCSC) and total tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), but TCSC differed by age and treatment ( e.g. , distinct CCR2, CXCR5, CXCR3, PD-1 and TIM- expression). Aged expressed significantly more T-cell PD-1 and up to 40-fold more PD-L2 versus young in myeloid and NK cells, and TCSC. Bone marrow-derived DC experiments suggest aged DC are destined for high PD-L2 versus young. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Treatment differences in aged vs. young could depend on immune checkpoint or TCSC differences. We are now identifying mechanisms for increased PD-L2 and contributions to aPD-L2 efficacy in aged, and testing TCSC effects. Our work can improve cancer immunotherapy in aged hosts and further provide important insights even in young hosts.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?