Frequency Characteristics of Acoustic Emissions Induced by Crack Propagation in Rock Tensile Fracture
Ruochen Jiang,Feng Dai,Yi Liu,Ang Li,Peng Feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02351-5
IF: 6.518
2021-01-01
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Abstract:Rocks are riddled with a large number of pre-existing microcracks (Ashby 1986; Yu and Feng 1995), which have significant influences on the strength, deformation, and rupture modes of rocks (Li et al. 2020). The initiation, propagation, and coalescence of micro-cracks inside stressed rocks may result in rock failure accompanied by the release and propagation of elastic waves in rocks, namely acoustic emission (AE). The generated AE signals inside rocks carry sufficient information on the released energy and can be used to reveal internal fracture characteristics and damage degree of rocks. AE monitoring technique can detect and record these vibration signals and reveal the local fracture characteristics (e.g., location, time, magnitude, fracture type) using various inversion strategies, which has widely applied in rock mechanics (Lavrov 2003; Prikry et al. 2003; Liu et al. 2015; Li et al. 2019; Wei et al. 2016). Moreover, previous studies have further extensively reported the strong relationship between AE and micro-seismic/seismic signals although the signal frequency scale and the fracture source dimension are significantly different (Benson et al. 2010; Benson et al. 2008; Burlini and Toro 2008), and indicated the potential values of AE signals for understanding rock fracture features (Lu et al. 2013, 2015). Therefore, reasonable and adequate interpretations of AE signals are vital in rock mechanics. The AE frequency analysis attracts much attention because it is directly correlated with different rock rupture mechanisms. It has been regarded as the basis of some crucial fracture source parameters like moment magnitude and stress drop (Vallejos and Mckinnon 2013; Yoshimitsu et al. 2014). The frequency spectrum or time–frequency spectrum is commonly used to reveal the frequency evolution of the AE signal, which can be produced by various transform methods, such as Fast Fourier transform (FFT), short-time Fourier transform (STFT), Wavelet Transform (WT) and Hilbert–Huang transform (HHT). Numerous researches and experiments have shown that the frequency characteristics of AE signals vary along time during the whole loading process, and different frequency cluster ranges have been reported in the previous literatures (Li et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2018). In the frequency analysis, it has been widely observed that the number of AE signals with low main frequency increased sharply and their amplitude soared when approaching the failure of rocks, compared with the early loading stages (Zhang et al. 2016; Gong et al. 2013; He et al. 2010; Wang et al. 2018). To be specific, the AE signals are featured by high frequency and low amplitude under relatively lower stress conditions. As the stress increases, the AE signals tend to be high amplitude. Before the bursting failure of rocks, a large number of higher amplitude and lower frequency AE events appear. He et al. (2010) and Ohnaka and Mogi (1982) explained this phenomenon using the inverse relationship between the crack size and the frequency of induced AE signals. Mogi (1963) investigated the fracture features and compared AE signals and seismic signals, and proposed that the micro-cracks in rocks can be regarded as the small-scale crustal rupture. Afterwards, the inverse relationship between crack length and main frequency of AE signals is concluded (Armstrong 1969; Maeda 1981). Based on fracture mechanics theory, Wang et al. (2018) researched the relationship between energy release rate, effective elastic modulus and crack length, and further verify the inverse relationship between frequency and fracture size in the rock uniaxial compression experiments using WT transform. Benson et al. (2008) studied and compared AE * Feng Dai fengdai@scu.edu.cn