Abstract:The Korean domestic market is focused on the introduction of BIM (Building Information Modeling) owing to an influx of investment due to increased interest and mandatory application of BIM. However, the rate of BIM introduction is high, while BIM user proficiency is low. Against these problems, the authors proposed an acceptance model for BIM in construction organizations in 2012. As the number of BIM application cases increases and the number of BIM-trained users increases as time goes on, BIM users’ positive perception of BIM values are expected to increase, which may change the BIM acceptance mechanism. Therefore, we conducted a longitudinal study of the 2012 BIM acceptance model against 2019 data to estimate changes in factors affecting BIM acceptance attitudes as well as the mechanism of the relationships between factors over time spent using the technology. To generalize the results, the respondents were spread across construction sites. The data obtained 119 samples from a sample of experienced users of BIM. We used AMOS 21.0 for hypothesis testing of structural equation modeling (SEM), and the 2019 BIM acceptance model was compared against the 2012 acceptance model using an independent sample t-test. As a result, it was confirmed that the 2012 BIM acceptance model is still suitable for describing the BIM acceptance mechanism of the construction organization, and there was a difference between the 2012 model and the 2019 model. This seems to have changed the mechanism of BIM acceptance by being change perception of BIM users as time goes on. The results of this study can be used to establish a BIM activation strategy for each BIM acceptance stage and are expected to be applicable to establishing a BIM activation strategy for construction organizations or countries with similar BIM acceptance stage.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is that in the South Korean construction industry, with the increasingly wide application of BIM (Building Information Modeling), the proficiency of BIM users is relatively low, which leads to the possibility that the acceptance mechanism of BIM technology may change over time. Specifically, the author proposed a BIM acceptance model in 2012. However, as time goes by, the number of BIM application cases increases, the number of BIM - trained users also increases, and the positive perception of BIM users may increase, thus changing the BIM acceptance mechanism. Therefore, through the longitudinal research method, this study uses the data in 2019 to test the BIM acceptance model proposed in 2012, in order to estimate the factors affecting the BIM acceptance attitude and the change of their relationship mechanisms over the usage time.
### Research Background
- **The Importance of BIM**: BIM contains not only the attribute information of building objects (such as walls, floors, windows, doors, roofs, stairs, etc.), but also 3D models, which enables construction projects to be completed faster, more efficiently and at a lower cost.
- **Market Situation**: According to market research, the BIM market is expected to grow at an annual rate of 14.9% and reach $10.36 billion by 2023.
- **The Current Situation of BIM Application in South Korea**: Although the implementation rate of BIM in South Korea is relatively high (58%), the proficiency of users is low, especially among non - engineer groups. In addition, the proportion of users who have used BIM but later stopped using it is also high.
### Research Purposes
- **Verify the 2012 BIM Acceptance Model**: Use the data in 2019 to verify whether the BIM acceptance model proposed in 2012 is still applicable.
- **Analyze Changes**: Explore the changes in the factors affecting the BIM acceptance attitude and their relationship mechanisms over time.
### Research Methods
- **Data Collection**: Collected data from 119 experienced BIM users through questionnaires.
- **Model Verification**: Used AMOS 21.0 to conduct hypothesis testing of the structural equation model (SEM) to verify the 2019 BIM acceptance model.
- **Comparative Analysis**: Used the independent - sample t - test to compare the BIM acceptance models in 2012 and 2019.
### Main Findings
- **Model Applicability**: The 2012 BIM acceptance model is still applicable to describe the BIM acceptance mechanism of construction organizations in 2019.
- **Factor Changes**: As time goes by, the factors affecting the BIM acceptance attitude and their relationship mechanisms have changed. For example, organizational support (OC) and behavioral control (BC) have a significant impact on perceived ease of use (PEU), while technical quality (TQ) and personal competence (PC) have a significant impact on perceived usefulness (PU).
- **Individual and Organizational Acceptance Intentions**: The individual intention to accept BIM (IIA) has a significant positive impact on the organizational intention to accept BIM (OIA).
### Conclusion
The results of this study show that as the usage time of BIM increases, users' perception and acceptance mechanisms will change. These findings are helpful for formulating BIM activation strategies for different acceptance stages, which are not only applicable to construction organizations in South Korea, but also can be applied to other countries or organizations with similar BIM acceptance stages.