Predictors of adverse prognosis in COVID‐19: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Stefano Figliozzi,Pier Giorgio Masci,Navid Ahmadi,Lara Tondi,Evangelia Koutli,Alberto Aimo,Kimon Stamatelopoulos,Meletios‐Athanasios Dimopoulos,Alida L. P. Caforio,Georgios Georgiopoulos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13362
2020-08-27
European Journal of Clinical Investigation
Abstract:BackgroundIdentification of reliable outcome predictors in Corona virus disease‐2019 (Covid‐19) is of paramount importance for improving patient's management. MethodsA systematic review of literature was conducted until April 24th, 2020. From 6,843 articles, 49 studies were selected for a pooled assessment; cumulative statistics for age and sex were retrieved in 587,790 and 602,234 cases. Two endpoints were defined: 1) a composite outcome including death, severe presentation, hospitalization in intensive care unit (ICU) and/or mechanical ventilation; 2) in‐hospital mortality. We extracted numeric data on patients' characteristics and cases with adverse outcomes and employed inverse variance random effects models to derive pooled estimates. ResultsWe identified 18 and 12 factors associated with the composite endpoint and death, respectively. Among those, a history of CVD (odds ratio (OR)=3.15, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 2.26‐4.41), acute cardiac (OR=10.58, 5.00‐22.40) or kidney (OR=5.13, 1.78‐14.83) injury, increased procalcitonin (OR=4.8, 2.034‐11.31) or D‐dimer (OR=3.7, 1.74‐7.89), and thrombocytopenia (OR=6.23, 1.031‐37.67) conveyed the highest odds for the adverse composite endpoint. Advanced age, male sex, cardiovascular comorbidities, acute cardiac or kidney injury, lymphocytopenia and D‐dimer conferred an increased risk of in‐hospital death. With respect to the treatment of the acute phase, therapy with steroids was associated with the adverse composite endpoint (OR=3.61, 95% CI 1.934‐6.73), but not with mortality. ConclusionsAdvanced age, comorbidities, abnormal inflammatory and organ injury circulating biomarkers captured patients with an adverse clinical outcome. Clinical history and laboratory profile may then help identify patients with a higher risk of in‐hospital mortality.
medicine, general & internal, research & experimental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?