Abstract:The extant meta-analyses that specifically focus on the differences between ACT and tCBT were published more than ten years ago. They had some methodological shortcomings (i.e., for the same outcome variable, only one primary effect size was included) and were not broad enough to consider factors such as moderating variables, follow-up changes, and dropout rates. Thus, it could not draw accurate and specific conclusions. Learning about the possible differences between tCBT and ACT can identify the more efficient intervention for individuals based on their characteristics and the moderators that may impact the intervention's efficacy and the dropout rate. In this way, treatment effectiveness can be maximized with limited resources. It can also facilitate a better comprehension of the two therapies and promote their further evolution or integration toward process-based therapy. This study aims to provide an updated three-level meta-analysis of comparison between the efficacy of ACT and tCBT. The three-level meta-analysis is able to effectively deal with the dependence between effect sizes by extracting all relevant effect sizes from each study, and thus can retain all the information and obtain the maximum statistical power. The current study included 38 studies with 2536 individuals. It was found that tCBT outperformed ACT on anxiety with a small effect both in the short term [g = 0.22, 95%CI (0.01, 0.23), p < 0.01; Q (df = 40) = 49.59, p > 0.05; I 2 Level 2 = 0, I 2 Level 3 = 26.2%] and long term [g = 0.16, 95%CI (0.03, 0.29), p < 0.05; Q (df = 29) = 25.96, p > 0.05; I 2 Level 2 = 0, I 2 Level 3 = 30.97%]. However, ACT outperformed tCBT on mindfulness in the short term with near medium effect [g = 0.48 (95%CI: 0.11 to 0.85; p < 0.05); Q (df = 5) = 10.28, p > 0.05; I 2 = 54.34%]. Population characteristics could be a moderating variable for the differences between ACT and tCBT. In the long term, for improving depression, tCBT may be more effective for individuals with physical symptoms. In the short term, for improving psychological flexibility, ACT may be more effective for no diagnoses reported participants or participants with behavioral health conditions, while tCBT may be more effective for individuals with physical symptoms. Besides, in the long term, for increasing psychological flexibility, ACT may outperform tCBT for no diagnoses reported participants. However, the moderating effect should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of RCTs included and the limited statistical power. Recommendations for future research, practical implications, and limitations are discussed.

A clinical effectiveness trial comparing ACT and CBT for inpatients with depressive and mixed mental disorders

A Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Cognitive Therapy for Anxiety and Depression

The Effectiveness of Metacognitive Therapy Compared to Behavioral Activation for Severely Depressed Outpatients: A Single-Center Randomized Trial

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: A Meta-Analytic Review

Acute treatment of inpatients with psychotic symptoms using Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Pilot results

Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Psychotic Severity Among Inpatients With Primary Psychoses: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) to reduce depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The differences between acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and cognitive behavioral therapy: A three-level meta-analysis

A Nonrandomized Effectiveness Comparison of Broad-Spectrum Group CBT to Individual CBT for Depressed Outpatients in a Community Mental Health Setting

Behavioral activation for depression in groups embedded in psychosomatic rehabilitation inpatient treatment: a quasi-randomized controlled study

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder: Navigating Depression Treatment in Traditional and Digital Settings with Insights from Current Research

Single-session acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) interventions for patients with chronic health conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Efficacy of trial-based cognitive therapy, behavioral activation and treatment as usual in the treatment of major depressive disorder: preliminary findings from a randomized clinical trial

Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in clinically depressed adolescents: individual CBT versus treatment as usual (TAU)

Comparing the Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) with Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in the Enhancement of Marital Satisfaction and Sexual Intimacy in Couples Referred to Counseling Centers

An Overview of Reviews on the Effects of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) on Depression and Anxiety

Effectiveness of Schema Therapy versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy versus Supportive Therapy for Depression in Inpatient and Day Clinic Settings: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Mental Illness in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy versus Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Children With Anxiety: Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Cognitive behavior therapy vs. control conditions, other psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies and combined treatment for depression: a comprehensive meta‐analysis including 409 trials with 52,702 patients

Effectiveness of Individual Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy and Predictors of Outcome in Adult Patients with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder