Ventilatory Strategies of Swimmers During Submaximal Efforts
Ben Skutnik,Ting Li,Christopher L. Brammer,Yifan Lu,Joel M. Stager
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000519134.56108.79
2017-01-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Pulmonary ventilation while swimming is constrained by the medium (water) and the timing associated with arm mechanics. Attempts at describing ventilation have been technically complex and therefore little published data exists on ventilatory strategies and pulmonary function while swimming. This is in contrast to the considerable data available for other exercise modes. METHODS: Ten trained, competitive men swimmers (age = 24.4 ± 1.91yrs) were asked to perform six submaximal exercise tests on separate days, three on a cycle ergometer and three while swimming in a flume. Workloads were set to elicit 70, 80, and 90% 2peak based off previous incremental tests in both modes. Tidal volume (VT), breathing frequency (fB), peak tidal flow expired (PTe), time to inspire (Ti) and expire (Te), total tidal time (Tt), and duty cycle (Ti/Ttot) were assessed repeatedly in both conditions via flow-volume loops. Oxygen consumption (2) and ventilation (E) was measured via open flow calorimetry. All variables were recorded over the final minute of each workload. Two-way, repeated measures ANOVAs were used for all comparisons, with the level of significance set at 0.05. RESULTS: At 70%, subjects had a larger E (79.04 ± 10.1 vs. 72.49 ± 11.2 L/min; p<0.05), Ti/Ttot (59.1 ± 2.86 vs. 48.8 ± 1.47%; p<0.05), and PTe (5.92 ± 0.79 vs. 3.53 ± 0.63 L/s; p<0.05), and smaller Te (0.70 ± 0.13 vs. 1.07 ± 0.35 s; p<0.05) when swimming compared to cycling. At 80%, subjects had a larger Ti/Ttot (58.9 ± 4.81 vs. 48.8 ± 2.78%; p<0.05), PTe (6.46 ± 1.16 vs. 4.31 ± 1.05 L/s; p<0.05), and smaller Te (0.62 ± 0.10 vs. 0.86 ± 0.23 s; p<0.05) when swimming compared to cycling. At 90%, subjects had a larger Ti/Ttot (59.1 ± 2.86 vs. 48.8 ± 1.47%; p<0.05) and PTe (6.47 ± 0.87 vs. 5.01 ± 1.05 L/s; p<0.05) but smaller E (95.49 ± 20.4 vs. 103.18 ± 22.0 L/min; p<0.05) and Te (0.61 ± 0.12 vs. 0.76 ± 0.23 s; p<0.05) when swimming compared to cycling. Swimming elicited a higher 2 across all intensities (3.16 ± 0.64, 3.36 ± 0.73, 3.57 ± 0.69 vs. 2.65 ± 0.35, 2.96 ± 0.44, 3.19 ± 0.50 L/min; p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Unlike cycling, ventilatory strategies during swimming seem to be independent from the metabolic demand, calling for a forced hyperventilation at lower intensities but transitioning into a hypoventilation at near maximal intensities. The cause of this phenomena remains unclear.