Risk Assessment on Offshore Photovoltaic Power Generation Projects in China Using D Numbers and ANP

Jie Zhou,Xiaoyan Su,Hong Qian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3014405

IF: 3.9

2020-01-01

IEEE Access

Abstract:At present, China's offshore photovoltaic (PV) industry is developing rapidly. Risk assessment on offshore PV power generation (OPVPG) projects is important. The existing risk assessment methods in OPVPG projects in China are insufficient in dealing with different types of uncertainties. In this paper, we propose a computational model based on D Numbers and analytic network process (ANP) method to handle risk assessment on OPVPG projects. Firstly, factors that influencing offshore photovoltaic power generation projects in China are identified and the weights of the factors are determined by domain analyst using ANP. Secondly, risk evaluation judgment on each factor is given by expert referring to predefined anchors and linguistic labels under specific situations. Thirdly, the judgments are represented as D numbers and are integrated into a fused D number. Finally, the overall risk level of OPVPG in China is obtained based on the fused D number. The main contribution of the proposed method based on D numbers is to deal with uncertainties and the degree of confidence in experts judgments. Uncertainty includes situations like: do not know how to assign accurate beliefs to risk levels and incomplete frame of discernment. The degree of confidence shows the cognition of the experts. The situation that the confidence of expert is equal to 1 shows the certainty of experts. When the confidence of expert is equal to 0, it means that experts cannot decide the risk levels. It can be considered as a new strategy for risk assessment and enriches the framework of decision-making. Several case studies are illustrated to show the effectiveness and flexibility of the proposed method.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to solve the risk assessment problems existing in China's offshore photovoltaic (OPVPG) power generation projects, especially the problem of dealing with different types of uncertainties. Specifically:

1. **Deficiencies of existing methods**: The existing risk assessment methods have deficiencies in dealing with different types of uncertainties and cannot fully cope with the complexity and uncertainty in offshore photovoltaic projects.

2. **Proposed new method**: The author proposes a computational model based on D - number and Analytic Network Process (ANP) to deal with the risk assessment of offshore photovoltaic projects. The main contribution of this method lies in its ability to handle uncertainty and the confidence level of expert judgment, thus evaluating risks more flexibly and comprehensively.

3. **Types of uncertainty**:
- **Unknown how to allocate accurate beliefs to risk levels**: For example, experts may not be able to determine the exact impact of a certain risk factor.
- **Incomplete identification framework**: In some cases, experts may not be able to provide complete information or assessment opinions.

4. **Expert confidence level**: This method not only considers experts' assessment of risk levels, but also takes into account the confidence level of experts in their judgments. When the confidence level is 1, it means that the expert is very certain; when the confidence level is 0, it means that the expert cannot determine the risk level.

5. **Flexibility and effectiveness of the method**: Through several case studies, the effectiveness and flexibility of this method are demonstrated, which can be used as a new risk assessment strategy and enriches the decision - making framework.

### Formula summary

- **Definition of D - number**:
\[
D: 2^{\Omega} \to [0,1], \quad \sum_{B \subseteq \Omega} D(B) \leq 1, \quad D(\emptyset) = 0
\]
where \(\Omega\) is a finite non - empty set and \(B\) is a subset of \(\Omega\).

- **Combination rule of D - numbers**:
\[
D(b) = v, \quad b = \frac{b_1^i + b_2^j}{2}, \quad v = \frac{v_1^i + v_2^j}{2C}
\]
where,
\[
C =
\begin{cases}
\sum_{j = 1}^{m} \sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{v_1^i + v_2^j}{2}, & \text{if } \sum_{i = 1}^{n} v_1^i = 1, \sum_{j = 1}^{m} v_2^j = 1 \\
\sum_{j = 1}^{m} \sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{v_1^i + v_2^j}{2} + \sum_{j = 1}^{m} \frac{v_1^c + v_2^j}{2}, & \text{if } \sum_{i = 1}^{n} v_1^i < 1, \sum_{j = 1}^{m} v_2^j = 1 \\
\sum_{j = 1}^{m} \sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{v_1^i + v_2^j}{2} + \sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{v_1^i + v_2^c}{2}, & \text{if } \sum_{i = 1}^{n} v_1^i = 1, \sum_{j = 1}^{m} v_2^j < 1 \\
\sum_{j = 1}^{m} \sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{v_1^i + v_2^j}{2} + \sum_{j = 1}^{m} \frac{v_1^c + v_2^j}{2} + \sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{v_1^i + v_2^c}{2} + \frac{v_1^c + v_2^c}{2}, & \text{if } \sum_{i = 1}^{n} v_1^i < 1, \sum_{j = 1}^{m} v_2^j < 1
\end{cases}
\]