Optimization of nitrogen fertilizer rate under integrated rice management in a hilly area of Southwest China

DONG Yujiao,YUAN Jiang,Guangbin ZHANG,MA Jing,Padilla HILARIO,LIU Xuejun,LU Shihua,Yujiao DONG,Jiang YUAN,Jing MA,Xuejun LIU,Shihua LU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1002-0160(20)60036-4
IF: 5.514
2020-12-01
Pedosphere
Abstract:China has the world's highest nitrogen (N) application rate, and the lowest N use efficiency (NUE). With the crop yield increasing, serious N pollution is also caused. An in-situ field experiment (2011–2015) was conducted to examine the effects of three N levels, 0 (i.e., no fertilizer N addition to soil), 120, and 180 kg N ha−1 using integrated rice management (IRM). We investigated rice yield, aboveground N uptake, and soil surface N budget in a hilly region of Southwest China. Compared to traditional rice management (TRM), IRM integrated raised beds, plastic mulch, furrow irrigation, and triangular transplanting, which significantly improved rice grain yield, straw biomass, aboveground N uptake, and NUE. Integrated rice management significantly improved 15N recovery efficiency (by 10%) and significantly reduced the ratio of potential 15N loss (by 8%–12%). Among all treatments, the 120 kg N ha−1 level under IRM achieved the highest 15N recovery efficiency (32%) and 15N residual efficiency (29%), with the lowest 15N loss ratio (39%). After rice harvest, the residual N fertilizer did not achieve a full replenishment of soil N consumption, as the replenishing effect was insufficient (ranging from −31 to −49 kg N ha−1). Furthermore, soil surface N budget showed a surplus (69–146 kg N ha−1) under all treatments, and the N surplus was lower under IRM than TRM. These results indicate IRM as a reliable and stable method for high rice yield and high NUE, while exerting a minor risk of N loss. In the hilly area of Southwest China, the optimized N fertilizer application rate under IRM was found to be 100–150 kg N ha−1.
soil science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to optimize the application amount of nitrogen fertilizer through Integrated Rice Management (IRM) in the hilly areas in southwestern China, so as to increase rice yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE), while reducing the environmental impact of nitrogen loss. Specifically, by comparing the effects of traditional rice management and integrated rice management under different nitrogen fertilizer levels (0 kg N ha\(^{-1}\), 120 kg N ha\(^{-1}\), 180 kg N ha\(^{-1}\)), the following points are explored: 1. **Increasing rice yield**: The study found that, compared with Traditional Rice Management (TRM), Integrated Rice Management significantly increased the grain yield and straw biomass of rice. Especially in the case of applying 120 kg N ha\(^{-1}\), both the grain yield and straw biomass reached the highest. 2. **Increasing Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE)**: Integrated Rice Management significantly increased the Nitrogen Recovery Efficiency (15Nuse) and reduced the proportion of potential 15N loss (15Nloss). Under the treatment of 120 kg N ha\(^{-1}\), 15Nuse reached 31.7% and the proportion of 15Nloss was the lowest, only 39.4%. 3. **Reducing nitrogen loss**: Through the analysis of the nitrogen budget on the soil surface, the study found that the nitrogen surplus under Integrated Rice Management was lower. Especially in the treatment of 120 kg N ha\(^{-1}\), the nitrogen surplus was only 68.9 kg N ha\(^{-1}\), which was 41.9% - 52.9% less than that in the treatment of 180 kg N ha\(^{-1}\) under traditional management. In conclusion, the main objective of this paper is to achieve high - yield and high - efficiency rice production and reduce the negative impact on the environment by optimizing the application amount of nitrogen fertilizer and combining with Integrated Rice Management techniques.