Abstract:BACKGROUND: The liver is one of the most important organs in the human body, with functions such as detoxification, digestion, and blood coagulation. In terms of vascular anatomy, the liver is divided into the left and the right liver by the main portal vein, and there are three hepatic efferent veins (right, middle, and left) and two portal branches. Patients with impaired liver function have increased intrahepatic vascular resistance and splanchnic vasodilation, which may lead to an increase in the portal pressure gradient (PPG) and cause portal hypertension (PHT). In order to measure the increased pressure gradient of portal vein, the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) can be measured to reflect it in clinical practice. The accuracy of PPG measurements is directly related to patient prognosis.AIM: To analyze the correlation between HVPG of three hepatic veins and PPG in patients with PHT.METHODS: From January 2017 to December 2019, 102 patients with PHT who met the inclusion criteria were evaluated during the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure and analyzed.RESULTS: The mean HVPG of the middle hepatic vein was 17.47 ± 10.25 mmHg, and the mean HVPG of the right and left hepatic veins was 16.34 ± 7.60 and 16.52 ± 8.15 mmHg, respectively. The average PPG was 26.03 ± 9.24 mmHg. The correlation coefficient and coefficient of determination of the right hepatic vein, middle hepatic vein, and left hepatic vein were 0.15 and 0.02 (P = 0.164); 0.25 and 0.05 (P = 0.013); and 0.14 and 0.02 (P = 0.013), respectively. The mean wedged hepatic vein/venous pressure (WHVP) of the middle and left hepatic veins was similar at 29.71 ± 12.48 and 29.1 ± 10.91 mmHg, respectively, and the mean WHVP of the right hepatic vein was slightly lower at 28.01 ± 8.95 mmHg. The mean portal vein pressure was 34.11 ± 8.56 mmHg. The correlation coefficient and coefficient of determination of the right hepatic vein, middle hepatic vein, and left hepatic vein were 0.26 and 0.07 (P = 0.009); 0.38 and 0.15 (P < 0.001); and 0.26 and 0.07 (P = 0.008), respectively. The average free hepatic venous pressure (FHVP) of the right hepatic vein was lowest at 11.67 ± 5.34 mmHg, and the average FHVP of the middle and left hepatic veins was slightly higher at 12.19 ± 4.88 and 11.67 ± 5.34 mmHg, respectively. The average inferior vena cava pressure was 8.27 ± 4.04 mmHg. The correlation coefficient and coefficient of determination of the right hepatic vein, middle hepatic vein, and left hepatic vein were 0.30 and 0.09 (P = 0.002); 0.18 and 0.03 (P = 0.078); and 0.16 and 0.03 (P = 0.111), respectively.CONCLUSION: Measurement of the middle hepatic vein HVPG could better represent PPG. Considering the high success rate of clinical measurement of the right hepatic vein, it can be the second choice.

Utility of minimally invasive measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient via the peripheral antecubital vein

Non-invasive Assessment of Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) Based on MR Flow Imaging and Computational Fluid Dynamics

Clinical utility of hepatic venous pressure gradient for predicting outcome and guiding treatment of cirrhosis and portal hypertension

Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Portal Pressure Gradient Measurement is Technically Successful and Safe Without Deep Sedation: A Proof-of-Concept Case Series

Invasive and Non-invasive Diagnosis of Portal Hypertension in Cirrhosis

Interventions for Portal Hypertension: Hepatic Vein Pressure Gradient and Trans Jugular Liver Biopsy

Impact of Intrahepatic Venovenous Shunt on Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient Measurement

Establishment and Assessment of the Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient Using Biofluid Mechanics (HVPGBFM): Protocol for a Prospective, Randomised, Non-Controlled, Multicentre Study.

Evaluation of portal hypertension in the cirrhotic patient: hepatic vein pressure gradient and beyond

S4071 Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Portal Pressure Gradient Measurement Accurately and Safely Streamlines Patient Care

Tolerance and acceptance of hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement in cirrhosis (CHESS1904): An international multicenter study

Effect of intrahepatic veno-venous communications on the consistency of hepatic venous pressure gradient and portal vein pressure gradient

Impact of catheter tip to hepatic vein ostium distance on the validity and prognostication of hepatic venous pressure gradient in cirrhosis

Correlation of pressure gradient in three hepatic veins with portal pressure gradient

Hepatic and Abdominal Carbon Dioxide Measurements Detect and Distinguish Hepatic Artery Occlusion and Portal Vein Occlusion in Pigs

Bibliometric-analysis visualization and review of non-invasive methods for monitoring and managing the portal hypertension

Correlation and Consistency Analysis Between Various Indirect Portal Pressure Gradients and Actual Portal Pressure Gradient

Monitoring the venous circulation: novel techniques and applications

EUS-guided Portal Pressure Gradient Measurement in Patients with Acute or Subacute Portal Hypertension.

Observation of blood motion in the internal jugular vein by contact and contactless photoplethysmography during physiological testing: case studies

Non-invasive predictive model for hepatic venous pressure gradient based on a 3-dimensional computed tomography volume rendering technology