Abstract:Prospective memory has become one of the hot spots in memory researches since 1970's.There are two paradigms of prospective memory research — the daily paradigm and the laboratory paradigm.In the daily paradigm research,prospective memory tasks are assigned to the subjects in everyday life(natural situations),such as sending postcards to the experimenter.In the laboratory paradigm research,prospective memory tasks are assigned to the subjects in the laboratory(laboratory situations),such as pressing the prescriptive keys when previously designated words appear on the computer screen.On this basis,Kvavilashvili(1992) divided the tasks which were assigned to the subjects in the course of the experiment into two kinds,i.e.natural task and artificial task.The former refers to the prospective memory task which links the experiment situation logically and is not realized by the subject,which belongs to the experiment task;the latter refers to the prospective memory that doesn't link the experiment logically and could be realized by the subject,which is the experiment task.So the tasks of prospective memory experiments could be divided into four types according to the experiment situation and task property:artificial task in natural situation(task type1),natural task in natural situation(task type2),artificial task in laboratory situation(task type3) and natural task in laboratory task(task type 4).Kvavilashvili thought the natural task in laboratory situation(task type 4) was the most ideal for prospective memory research,because it could avoid the ceiling effect and it took account of the ecological effect.This research started from the classification of prospective memory tasks and discussed further the consistence of the performance that subjects finished on the four types of prospective memory tasks.Specifically,it's to make certain whether the performances on the artificial and natural tasks in laboratory situation and natural situation are highly correlated or not.This result can be used to answer the following questions:1) As Kvavilashvili mentioned,compared with other three tasks,is the natural task in the laboratory situation really the most ideal prospective memory research task? 2) Are prospective memories in the laboratory and in the everyday life situation the same and can be mutually anticipated? 3) Can natural and artificial prospective memories be mutually anticipated? Tests were done in turns to 47 undergraduates between bringing paper and pen(type 2),prospective memory test in the laboratory(type 3),signing the date when finishing the test(type4) and sending a text message to the experimenter2 days later(type1).The results indicated that prospective memories of different attributes in the same situation were consistent,especially in the natural situation.But the same attribute of prospective memories in different task situations were inconsistent.So prospective memories of the same task attribute in different task situations are inconsistent;prospective memories in laboratory and in natural situations can't be anticipated with each other.The reason was due to the subjects carrying out the daily prospective memories tasks based on their evaluation of the importance of the task.The importance is more influential than the attribute of target familiarity and clue specificity on the implementation of the task.The results could not only afford reference for improving ecological validity and choosing an appropriate experiment task of prospective memory research,but also provide illumination to the measurement of the ability of prospective memory.

Predictors of everyday prospective memory performance: A superiority in the execution of event-based tasks over time-based tasks reverses in real-life situations.

Predictors of Everyday Prospective Memory Performance: A Superiority in the Execution of Event-Based Tasks over Time-Based Tasks Reverses in Real-Life Situations

Prospective memory in Parkinson disease across laboratory and self-reported everyday performance.

The relative importance of suboperations of prospective memory

Assessing time-based prospective memory online: A comparison study between laboratory-based and web-based testing

Prospective memory assessment: Scientific advances and future directions

Individual differences in time-based prospective memory: The roles of working memory and time monitoring

The role of time-monitoring behaviour in time-based prospective memory performance in younger and older adults

Age- and Task-Setting-Related Performance Predictions in Prospective Memory: Can Metacognition Explain the Age-Prospective Memory Paradox?

Preserved Intention Maintenance and Impaired Execution of Prospective Memory Responses in Schizophrenia: Evidence from an Event-based Prospective Memory Study

Acute social stress before the planning phase improves memory performance in a complex real life-related prospective memory task

Involvement of the anterior cingulate cortex in time-based prospective memory task monitoring: An EEG analysis of brain sources using Independent Component and Measure Projection Analysis

The first signs of prospective memory

An ecologically valid examination of event-based and time-based prospective memory using immersive virtual reality: the influence of attention, memory, and executive function processes on real-world prospective memory

Internalizing versus externalizing control: Different ways to perform a time-based prospective memory task.

Prospective Memory Performance Across Adolescence

From the lab to the classroom: Improving children's prospective memory in a natural setting

I could do it now, but I'd rather (forget to) do it later: examining links between procrastination and prospective memory failures

Prospective memory errors in everyday life: does instruction matter?

Are Prospective Memories in Different Task Situations Consistent?

Time-Based prospective memory predicts insight into functional abilities among community-dwelling older adults