Abstract:ABSTRACT This study analyzes the impacts of the fair design and use of the budgetary process, from the perspectives of formal and informal justice, on fairness judgments, on budgetary participation, and on managerial performance. Complementarily, it also analyzes the mediating effect. Research on the impacts of budgetary participation on managerial performance presents conflicting and inconclusive evidence. The studies on organizational justice, in turn, mainly focus on individual perceptions of justice, from a descriptive and perceptual perspective, not considering the normative approach, and treating justice rules and fairness judgments as synonymous. That segregation is relevant as it reinforces the importance of the fair design and use of the budgetary process, going beyond considering individual fairness judgments. The research revealed that the fair design and use of the budgetary process influence managerial performance; however, the individual perception of justice (fairness judgments) did not exert a direct influence. These findings are relevant because they highlight the impacts of justice in terms of the effects that a system generates, not only considering individual perceptions. A survey was conducted with a random sample of 110 managers chosen using the LinkedIn social network. For the data analysis, the structural equations modeling technique was applied. The study contributes to the literature that examines behavioral aspects of the relationship between budgetary participation and managerial performance, by seeking to understand in which conditions budgetary participation results in better performance. In this research, these relationships are analyzed in light of the foundations of justice, from the perspective of justice rules and fairness judgments. The evidence suggests that budgetary participation affects managerial performance when it results from the fair design and use of the budgetary process.

Do e-government initiatives and e-participation affect the level of budget transparency?

Factors Explaining Public Participation in the Central Government Budget Process

"How much?" Is Not Enough - An Analysis of Open Budget Initiatives

E-government-enabled transparency: The effect of electoral aspects and citizen’s access to Internet on information disclosure

Determinants of Central Government Budget Disclosure: An International Comparative Analysis

Making Budgets Attractive: Best Practices From Government’s Financial Transparency Portals

The Influence of Budget Transparency and Public Participation on The Effectiveness of Budget Management Policies

Empirical Study on the Evaluation Model of Public Satisfaction With Local Government Budget Transparency: A Case From China

Budget transparency innovation in the Czech local government

The Problem of Measurements: Fiscal Transparency and Diverging Outcomes

Digital Governance: An Assessment of Performance and Best Practices

Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies

Can e-government initiatives alleviate tax evasion? The moderation effect of ICT

Exploring the relationship between government budget information and citizens’ perceptions of public service performance in China

Critical factors influencing information disclosure in public organisations

Thirty Years of Studies on Transparency, Accountability, and Corruption in the Public Sector: The State of the Art and Opportunities for Future Research

Can fiscal transparency mitigate political budget cycles?

E-government, education quality, internet access in schools, and tax evasion

Is Digital Government Advancing Sustainable Governance? A Study of OECD/EU Countries

Fair design and use of the budgetary process and managerial performance

The Influence of Administrative Culture on Sustainability Transparency in European Local Governments