Abstract:Key PointsBacteria often exist in biofilms, which are surface-adhering or free-floating groups of cells that are bound together by a secreted polymer matrix. These microbial collectives are important for bacterial occupation of diverse ecological niches, they contribute to biogeochemical cycling, and they cause disease in multicellular organisms.Within biofilms, bacteria interact with each other closely through cooperative phenotypes, such as the production of digestive enzymes, and antagonistic phenotypes, such as the expression of type V or type VI secretion systems. The evolutionary dynamics of these social phenotypes depend on their costs and their effects on other cells.Many bacterial social phenotypes involve the secretion of products that affect neighbours in a distance-dependent manner. As a result, interaction networks within biofilms are largely determined by the spatial structure of the biofilms — that is, the arrangement in space of different clones, strains and species.When biofilms are segregated into clonal clusters, the neighbourhood of a given cell mostly contains clonemates, and natural selection often favours the secretion of compounds that benefit all recipient cells. However, when different strains and species are spatially mixed within biofilms, cells primarily interact with other genotypes and antagonistic behaviour is often favoured. Under certain circumstances, between-species commensalism or mutualism can also evolve and remain stable against cheating.Cooperative and antagonistic phenotypes fall under the control of sophisticated sensory mechanisms, such as competition sensing and quorum sensing, that evolved to help account for the variation in exposure to other strains and species in space and time. These regulatory mechanisms help to reduce the marginal costs of social phenotypes, maximize their fitness impacts and ensure that the correct recipient cells are targeted.Both cooperative and antagonistic behaviours feed back onto population spatial structure by locally altering the growth rates of other cells and thus changing local biofilm composition.Many bacteria and unicellular eukaryotes have evolved strategies for actively altering biofilm population structure, either through selective adhesion that spatially assorts the biofilm into groups that contain one or more specific genotypes or through the secretion of extracellular matrix components that spatially organize biofilm-dwelling cells.

Swarming bacteria undergo localized dynamic phase transition to form stress-induced biofilms

Biophysics underlying the swarm to biofilm transition

Self-adaptation of Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms to hydrodynamic stress

Emergent pattern formation in an interstitial biofilm

Agent-based modeling of stress anisotropy driven nematic ordering in growing biofilms

Should I stay or should I go? Spatio-temporal dynamics of bacterial biofilms in confined flows

Metabolic Co-Dependence Gives Rise to Collective Oscillations Within Biofilms

Motility-induced buckling and glassy dynamics regulate three-dimensional transitions of bacterial monolayers

How bacteria actively use passive physics to make biofilms

Experimental and Theoretical Studies on the Morphogenesis of Bacterial Biofilms.

Proteomic Analysis Reveals a Biofilm-Like Behavior of Planktonic Aggregates of Staphylococcus epidermidis Grown Under Environmental Pressure/Stress

Swarming bacteria exhibit developmental phase transitions to establish scattered colonies in new regions

Bacillus subtilis biofilm formation and social interactions

Stochastic pulsing of gene expression enables the generation of spatial patterns in Bacillus subtilis biofilms

Biofilms in lab and nature: a molecular geneticist's voyage to microbial ecology

Spatial structure, cooperation and competition in biofilms

The role of shear dynamics in biofilm formation

Surface remodeling and inversion of cell-matrix interactions underlies community recognition and dispersal in biofilms

A biophysical threshold for biofilm formation

Stress-hardening behaviour of biofilm streamers

Effectsof boundary on biofilm morphogenesis