Abstract:Malignant transformation drastically alters the mechanical properties of the cell and its response to the surrounding cellular environment. We studied the influence of the physical contact between adjacent cells in an epithelial monolayer on the viscoelastic behavior of normal MCF10A, non-invasive cancerous MCF7, and invasive cancerous MDA-MB-231 human breast cells. Using an atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging technique termed force clamp force mapping (FCFM) to record images of the viscoelastic material properties, we found that normal MCF10A cells are stiffer and have a lower fluidity at confluent than at sparse density. Contrarily, cancerous MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cells do not stiffen and do not decrease their fluidity when progressing from sparse to confluent density. The behavior of normal MCF10A cells appears to be governed by the formation of stable cell-cell contacts, because their disruption with a calcium-chelator (EGTA) causes the stiffness and fluidity values to return to those at sparse density. In contrast, EGTA-treatment of MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cells does not change their viscoelastic properties. Confocal fluorescence microscopy showed that the change of the viscoelastic behavior in MCF10A cells when going from sparse to confluent density is accompanied by a remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton into thick stress fiber bundles, while in MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cells the actin cytoskeleton is only composed of thin and short fibers, regardless of cell density. While the observed behavior of normal MCF10A cells might be crucial for providing mechanical stability and thus in turn integrity of the epithelial monolayer, the dysregulation of this behavior in cancerous MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cells is possibly a central aspect of cancer progression in the epithelium.STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: We measured the viscoelastic properties of normal and cancerous human breast epithelial cells in different states of confluency using atomic force microscopy. We found that confluent normal cells are stiffer and have lower fluidity than sparse normal cells, which appears to be governed by the formation of cell-cell contacts. Contrarily, confluent cancer cells do not stiffen and not have a decreased fluidity compared to sparse cancer cells and their viscoelastic properties are independent of cell-cell contact formation. While the observed behavior of normal cells appears to be crucial for providing the mechanical stability and therefore the integrity of the epithelial monolayer, the dysregulation of this behavior in cancer cells might be a central aspect of early stage cancer progression and metastasis in the epithelium.

Elasticity-dependent response of malignant cells to viscous dissipation

Differential modulation of cell morphology, migration, and Neuropilin-1 expression in cancer and non-cancer cell lines by substrate stiffness

Matrix viscoelasticity controls epithelial cell mechanobiology through dimensionality

Linking Metastatic Potential and Viscoelastic Properties of Breast Cancer Spheroids via Dynamic Compression and Relaxation in Microfluidics

Extracellular fluid viscosity enhances cell migration and cancer dissemination

Substrate Stiffness Modulates the Growth, Phenotype, and Chemoresistance of Ovarian Cancer Cells

Elucidating the combinatorial effect of substrate stiffness and surface viscoelasticity on cellular phenotype

Stemness and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition of Breast Cancer Cells Incubated on Viscoelastic Gel Substrates

Correlating the viscoelasticity of breast cancer cells with their malignancy

The motility of normal and cancer cells in response to the combined influence of substrate rigidity and anisotropic microstructure

Linking metastatic potential and viscoelastic properties of breast cancer spheroids via dynamics compression and relaxation in microfluidics

Beyond stiffness: deciphering the role of viscoelasticity in cancer evolution and treatment response

Enhancement effects of extracellular fluid viscosity and matrix stiffness on cancer cell mechanosensing

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and stemness of breast cancer cells: Effect of viscoelasticity of the substrate to mimics microenvironment

Cell viscosity influences hematogenous dissemination and metastatic extravasation of tumor cells

Cell spheroid viscoelasticity is deformation-dependent

Cell response to extracellular matrix viscous energy dissipation outweighs high-rigidity sensing

Stemness of breast cancer cells incubated on viscoelastic gel substrates

Differential Effects of Tumor Secreted Factors on Mechanosensitivity, Capillary Branching, and Drug Responsiveness in PEG Hydrogels.

Viscoelastic properties of normal and cancerous human breast cells are affected differently by contact to adjacent cells

Impact of Viscosity on Human Hepatoma Spheroids in Soft Core-Shell Microcapsules