Exercise training‐induced visceral fat loss in obese women: The role of training intensity and modality

Haifeng Zhang,Tomas K. Tong,Zhaowei Kong,Qingde Shi,Yang Liu,Jinlei Nie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13803

2020-09-04

Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports

Abstract:Visceral fat loss in response to four cycle ergometer training regimens with explicit differences in exercise intensity and modality were compared. 59 obese young women (body fat percentage ≥30%) were randomized to a 12‐wk intervention consisting of either all‐out sprint interval training (SITall‐out, n=11); supramaximal SIT (SIT120, 120% V̇O2peak, n=12); high‐intensity interval training (HIIT90, 90% V̇O2peak, n=12), moderate‐intensity continuous training (MICT, 60% V̇O2peak, n=11), or no training (CON, n=13). The total work done per training session in SIT120, HIIT90, and MICT was confined to 200 KJ, while it was deliberately lower in SITall‐out. The abdominal visceral fat area (AVFA) was measured through computed tomography scans. The whole‐body and regional fat mass were assessed through dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry. Pre‐, post‐, and 3‐hr post‐exercise serum growth hormone (GH), and epinephrine (EPI) were measured during selected training sessions. Following the intervention, similar reductions in whole‐body and regional fat mass were found in all intervention groups, while the reductions in AVFA resulting from SITall‐out, SIT120, and HIIT90 (> 15 cm2) were greater in comparison to MICT (< 3.5 cm2, P < 0.05). The AVFA reductions among the SITs and HIIT groups were similar, and it was concomitant with the similar exercise‐induced releases of serum GH and EPI. CON variables were unchanged. These findings suggest that visceral fat loss induced by interval training at or above 90% V̇O2peak appeared unresponsive to the change in training intensity. Nonetheless, SITall‐out is still the most time‐efficient strategy among the four exercise‐training regimes for controlling visceral obesity.

sport sciences