Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to examine the most commonly used categories of sustainability literature review regarding their purpose, nature, strengths, weaknesses and potential for impact. This paper also discusses the motivation, incremental contribution and framing that occurs by considering the research papers included in this Special Issue. Design/methodology/approach Given the paucity of clear guidelines for undertaking, writing and publishing literature review studies in sustainability research, this paper describes the main types and processes in conducting a literature review and emerging tools that can help advance the field. Findings This paper finds a variety of approaches in application with strengths and weaknesses, including the emerging role of software support, artificial intelligence and machine learning. This paper reviews the ethical implications of using emerging tools in the sustainability literature review methodology and their impacts on originality, authenticity and accountability. This paper discusses the seven carefully selected and meticulously reviewed articles in this Special Issue through the lens of these findings by specifically highlighting their purpose, strengths, weaknesses and practical and policy implications. Practical Implications Through the systemization of ways to conduct meaningful literature reviews, this paper explores the significant relevance of the method in creating a basis of academic understanding and advancing future research that can have significant impacts on the industry. Through the discussion of the articles in this Special Issue, this paper highlights the practical and policy implications and limitations of literature reviews in sustainability research. Social Implications This paper highlights the purpose of literature reviews in identifying areas for further research and how the papers included in this Special Issue achieve this goal, i.e. how their findings possess specific positive externalities in summarizing and systematizing sustainability research. Originality/Value This paper systematizes methods and processes for writing impactful literature reviews in sustainability research, particularly focusing on the use of emerging technology and the opportunities and challenges this may offer in this process.

Are we not Reinventing the Wheel?: Reviewing Literature in Social Science Scholarship and the Imperatives of Aligning with Global Best Practices

(Re)visiting African communication scholarship: critical perspectives on research and theory

Educational leadership, management and administration in Africa: an analysis of contemporary literature

Social Science and Humanities Research in and on Africa: Searching for Alternatives

The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising

Indigenous-language Media Research in Africa: Gains, Losses, Towards a New Research Agenda

Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: a research agenda

Between Sweet Harmony and a Clash of Cultures: Does a Joint Academic–Practitioner Review Reconcile Rigor and Relevance?

Advancing knowledge through literature reviews: ‘what’, ‘why’, and ‘how to contribute’

A scoping review on what constitutes a good research culture

The Sino-African higher education exchange: toward building a literature

Writing Book Reviews: Perceptions and Experiences of Chinese Novice Scholars

The perilous path: reimagining promotion and tenure in African academia

Wicked Problems in Africa: A Systematic Literature Review

Surfacing a hidden literature

Literature Review in Scientific Research: An Overview

Can African scholars speak? Situating African voices in International Communication scholarship

Publishing experiences of researchers in the developing world: An analysis of submissions to the Review of Development Economics, January 2015 to April 2022

Sustainability literature review research: advancing theory and practice

The “African male literary tradition” and revisionist polemics in Isidore Okpewho’s writing

Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice