Early childhood attachment stability and change: a meta-analysis

Jessica E. Opie,Jennifer E. McIntosh,Timothy B. Esler,Robbie Duschinsky,Carol George,Allan Schore,Emily J. Kothe,Evelyn S. Tan,Christopher J. Greenwood,Craig A. Olsson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2020.1800769
2020-08-10
Abstract:Examining degrees of stability in attachment throughout early childhood is important for understanding developmental pathways and for informing intervention. Updating and building upon all prior meta-analyses, this study aimed to determine levels of stability in all forms of attachment classifications across early childhood. Attachment stability was assessed between three developmental epochs within early childhood: infancy, toddlerhood, and preschool/early school. To ensure data homogeneity, only studies that assessed attachment with methods based on the strange situation procedure were included. Results indicate moderate levels of stability at both the four-way (secure, avoidant, resistant, and disorganised; κ = 0.23) and secure/insecure (r = 0.28) levels of assessment. Meta-regression analysis indicated security to be the most stable attachment organisation. This study also found evidence for publication bias, highlighting a preference for the publication of significant findings.
psychology, developmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?