In vitro and in vivo evaluations of wine lees as feeds for ruminants: Effects on ruminal fermentation characteristics, nutrient digestibility, blood metabolites and antioxidant status

Yoshiaki Sato,Takashi Nakanishi,Lin Wang,Kazato Oishi,Hiroyuki Hirooka,Hajime Kumagai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104217
IF: 1.929
2020-11-01
Livestock Science
Abstract:<p>Wine lees are by-products of wine-manufacturing, but the usefulness as animal by-product feed has not yet been revealed. The present study was aimed to investigate the usability of wine lees as feed for ruminants in fattening conditions by <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> trials. In <em>in vitro</em> experiments (<em>in vitro</em> I and II), the following four treatments were prepared: 100% dry matter (DM) rolled barley as a control (WL0), and replaced 7.5% DM, 15.0% DM, and 22.5% DM of wine lees as three treatments (WL7.5, WL15, WL22.5, respectively). A linear decrease in gas production was observed at 48 h after incubation with an increase in the percentage of wine lees in the substrate (P &lt; 0.01). The DM and crude protein (CP) digestibility were linearly decreased with wine lees inclusion (P &lt; 0.01), while neutral detergent fiber expressed exclusive of residual ash (NDFom) digestibility was linearly increased (P &lt; 0.05). The polyphenolic contents and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging ability of fermented residue were linearly increased with wine lees inclusion (P &lt; 0.01 and 0.05, respectively). The proportion of α-linolenic acid and total polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) in the residues after incubation was linearly increased with wine lees inclusion (P &lt; 0.01). Additionally, in <em>in vivo</em> experiment, four cannulated wethers were used in a 4 × 4 Latin square design experiment and each wether was assigned to one of the following feeding treatments: C, basal concentrate without wine lees; L, 6.7% DM of concentrate was replaced with wine lees; M, 13.3% DM of concentrate was replaced with wine lees; H, 20.0% DM of concentrate was replaced with wine lees. The apparent digestibilities of DM, CP, and NDFom did not differ among the treatments (P &gt; 0.05). As wine lees increased, the proportion of ruminal propionate at 4 h after feeding and plasma malondialdehyde, which is one of the oxidative stress markers, were decreased (P &lt; 0.05), and inorganic phosphorus concentration in plasma was increased (P &lt; 0.05). No significant difference was observed in the nitrogen balance between the treatments. Conclusively, the wine lees substituted for the fattening ration up to 20% DM had no adverse effects on apparent digestibility, ruminal fermentation, and nitrogen balance and decreased an oxidative stress marker in plasma <em>in vivo</em>. Although the gas production and DM and CP digestibility were decreased <em>in vitro</em>, wine lees inclusion protected PUFA from ruminal biohydrogenation during ruminal fermentation. Thus, wine lees have a potential to be an important alternative as a partial substitute for antioxidant products.</p>
agriculture, dairy & animal science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?