Open label phase I/II clinical trial and predicted efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein vaccines SOBERANA 02 and SOBERANA Plus in children

Rinaldo Puga-Gómez,Yariset Ricardo-Delgado,Chaumey Rojas-Iriarte,Leyanis Céspedes-Henriquez,Misleidys Piedra-Bello,Dania Vega-Mendoza,Noelvia Pestana Pérez,Beatriz Paredes-Moreno,Meiby Rodríguez-González,Carmen Valenzuela-Silva,Belinda Sánchez-Ramírez,Laura Rodríguez-Noda,Rocmira Pérez-Nicado,Raul González-Mugica,Tays Hernández-García,Talía Fundora-Barrios,Martha Dubet Echevarría,Juliet María Enriquez-Puertas,Yenicet Infante Hernández,Ariel Palenzuela-Díaz,Evelyn Gato-Orozco,Yanet Chappi-Estévez,Julio Cesar Francisco-Pérez,Miladi Suarez Martinez,Ismavy C. Castillo-Quintana,Sonsire Fernandez-Castillo,Yanet Climent-Ruiz,Darielys Santana-Mederos,Yanelda García-Vega,María Eugenia Toledo-Romani,Delaram Doroud,Alireza Biglari,Yury Valdés-Balbín,Dagmar García-Rivera,Vicente Vérez-Bencomo,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.03.22271313
2022-03-06
Abstract:Abstract Objectives To evaluate heterologous vaccination scheme in children 3-18 y/o combining two SARS-CoV-2 r-RBD protein vaccines. Methods A phase I/II open-label, adaptive and multicenter trial evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of two doses of SOBERANA02 and a heterologous third dose of SOBERANA Plus in 350 children 3-18 y/o in Havana Cuba. Primary outcomes were safety (in phase I) and safety/immunogenicity (in phase II) measured by anti-RBD IgG ELISA, molecular and live-virus neutralization titers and specific T-cells response. A comparison with adult‘s immunogenicity and prediction of efficacy were done based on immunological results Results Local pain was the unique adverse event with frequency >10%, none was serious or severe. Two doses of SOBERANA 02 elicited humoral immune response similar to natural infection; the third dose increased significantly the response in all children, similar to that achieved in vaccinated young adults and higher than in convalescents children. The neutralizing titer was evaluated in a participant‘s subset: GMT was 173.8 (CI 95% 131.7; 229.5) vs. alpha, 142 (CI 95% 101.3; 198.9) vs. delta and 24.8 (CI 95% 16.8; 36.6) vs. beta. An efficacy > 90% was estimated. Conclusion The heterologous scheme was safe and immunogenic in children 3-18 y/o. Trial registry: https://rpcec.sld.cu/trials/RPCEC00000374
What problem does this paper attempt to address?