Abstract:PurposeThis paper aims to study how state ownership influences the innovation process in terms of allocating resources toward searching for new solutions and converting these efforts into economic value. On one hand, deep pockets of the state provide slack resources that may facilitate risk taking and innovation. On the other hand, soft budgets can create incentive problems and dampen the efficient use of resources. The authors suggest how accounting for competitive context can disentangle these countervailing forces.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use a panel of over 240,000 Chinese firms over the years 2004–2008. The broad sample and period afforded substantial variability in terms of state ownership within and across firms. The authors use a two-stage model and a within-firm (i.e. fixed-effects) design, controlling for all time-invariant firm characteristics and the problematic unobserved heterogeneity that can often lead to erroneous inferences. Furthermore, the relatively short window limits the likelihood of time-varying unobserved firm characteristics biasing the empirical results.FindingsThe authors found that private-sector competition has the opposite effect on the relationship between state ownership and the second step of the innovation process. In industries where there is robust private-sector competition, state ownership diminishes the firm’s ability to convert R&D efforts into economic value. Private-sector competition competes away any advantages state-owned firms may have in terms of developing or accessing the complementary resources needed for commercialization. Ultimately, the inefficiencies of state ownership in terms of relatively undisciplined selection and monitoring of R&D activities outweigh any potential resource advantages derived from state ownership.Originality/valueThe state remains a prominent player in many economies throughout the world. The authors explored how state ownership of firms influences the resources they expend in searching out new solutions, and their success in converting such resources into economically valuable new products and services. State ownership has potentially countervailing effects on innovation. The authors disentangle these countervailing effects through consideration of how accounting for competitive context could determine whether the beneficial effects of state ownership dominate its detrimental effects for both searching for new solutions and converting these efforts into economically valuable new products. With a focus of market competition as an external force that drives the difference in innovation between SOEs and the private-sector, this study serves as a parallel effort to Jiaet al.(2019) who investigate the joint effect of public and corporate governance on SOEs’ innovation performance, and Zhouet al.(2017) who concern the balance of the institution and efficiency logics on the comparative advantage of SOEs over privately owned enterprises in innovation performance.

Does bank competition spur firm innovation?

The effects of corporate governance and ownership on the innovation performance of Chinese SMEs

Bank Competition, Financing Constraints, and Enterprise Innovation Investment

Bank Competition, Financing Constraints and Enterprise Innovation

Does Bank Competition Inhibit the Formation of Zombie Firms?

Bank Competition, Information Specialization and Innovation

Banking Market Competition and Corporate Innovation

Bank price competition and enterprise innovation——Based on empirical evidence of Chinese A-share listed companies

Does Banking Competition Affect Innovation?

Bank market structure and firm innovation-evidence from China

Foreign competition, domestic competition and innovation in Chinese private high-tech new ventures

Bank competition and corporate financial asset holdings

Bank Competition, Combination of Industry and Finance, and Enterprise Innovation: Evidence from China

How Local is Local? Evidence from Bank Competition and Corporate Innovation in U.S.

Does Bank Competition Alleviate Financing Constraints in China? Further Evidence From Listed Firms

State Ownership, Firm Innovation and the Moderating Role of Private-Sector Competition: the Case of China

Do financial innovations influence bank performance? Evidence from China

Bank Competition and Access to Finance: Evidence from African Countries

Power of Competition: Unraveling the Impact of China's Fair Competition Review System Implementation on Firm Innovation

Financial Constraints and Firm Innovative Performance: Evidence from Chinese Companies