Abstract:Schizophrenia subjects often suffer from a failure to properly predict incoming inputs; most notably, some patients exhibit impaired prediction of the sensory consequences of their own actions. The mechanisms underlying this deficit remain unclear, though. One possible mechanism could consist in aberrant predictive processing, as schizophrenic patients show relatively less attenuated neuronal activity to self-produced tones, than healthy controls. Here, we tested the hypothesis that this aberrant predictive mechanism would manifest itself in the temporal irregularity of neuronal signals. For that purpose, we here introduce an event-related potential (ERP) study model analysis that consists of an EEG real-time model equation, eeg(t) and a frequency Laplace transformed Transfer Function (TF) equation, eeg(s). Combining circuit analysis with control and cable theory, we estimate the temporal model representations of auditory ERPs to reveal neural mechanisms that make predictions about self-generated sensations. We use data from 49 schizophrenic patients (SZ) and 32 healthy control (HC) subjects in an auditory 'prediction' paradigm; i.e., who either pressed a button to deliver a sound tone (epoch a), or just heard the tone without button press (epoch b). Our results show significantly higher degrees of temporal irregularity or imprecision between different trials of the ERP from the Cz electrode (N100, P200) in SZ compared to HC (Levene's test, p < 0.0001) as indexed by altered latency, lower similarity/correlation of single trial time courses (using dynamic time warping), and longer settling times to reach steady state in the intertrial interval. Using machine learning, SZ vs HC could be highly accurately classified (92%) based on the temporal parameters of their ERPs' TF models, using as features the poles of the TF rational functions. Together, our findings show temporal irregularity or imprecision between single trials to be abnormally increased in SZ. This may indicate a general impairment of SZ, related to precisely predicting the sensory consequences of one's actions.

Prediction errors bidirectionally bias time perception

Why Can't We Accurately Predict Others' Decisions? Prediction Discrepancy in Risky Decision-Making

Learning from imagined experiences via an endogenous prediction error

Dopaminergic prediction errors in the ventral tegmental area reflect a multithreaded predictive model

Building and Breaking the Chain: A Model of Reward Prediction Error Integration and Segmentation of Memory

What happens next and when "next" happens: Mechanisms of spatial and temporal prediction

Hierarchy of prediction errors shapes the learning of context-dependent sensory representations

Expected reward value and reward prediction errors reinforce but also interfere with human time perception

Cooperative thalamocortical circuit mechanism for sensory prediction errors

Prediction-error signals in anterior cingulate cortex drive task-switching

Temporal Prediction through Integration of Probability Distributions of Event Timings at Multiple Levels

Neural integration underlying naturalistic prediction flexibly adapts to varying sensory input rate

Error modulates categorization of subsecond durations in multitasking contexts

Learning prediction error neurons in a canonical interneuron circuit

Temporal mechanisms underlying visual processing bias in peri-hand space

Prediction Error During Retrospective Revaluation of Causal Associations in Humans: Fmri Evidence in Favor of an Associative Model of Learning

Temporal regularities shape perceptual decisions and striatal dopamine signals

The Dopamine Prediction Error: Contributions to Associative Models of Reward Learning

Does temporal irregularity drive prediction failure in schizophrenia? temporal modelling of ERPs