Abstract:Anthropogenic climate change threatens the structure and function of ecosystems throughout the globe, but many people are still skeptical of its existence. Traditional "knowledge deficit model" thinking has suggested that providing the public with more facts about climate change will assuage skepticism. However, presenting evidence contrary to prior beliefs can have the opposite effect and result in a strengthening of previously held beliefs, a phenomenon known as biased assimilation or a backfire effect. Given this, strategies for effectively communicating about socioscientific issues that are politically controversial need to be thoroughly investigated. We randomly assigned 184 undergraduates from an environmental science class to one of three experimental conditions in which we exposed them to short videos that employed different messaging strategies: (a) an engaging science lecture, (b) consensus messaging, and (c) elite cues. We measured changes in student perceptions of climate change across five constructs (content knowledge, acceptance of scientific consensus, perceived risk, support for action, and climate identity) before and after viewing videos. Consensus messaging outperformed the other two conditions in increasing student acceptance of the scientific consensus, perceived risk of climate change, and climate identity, suggesting this may be an effective strategy for communicating the gravity of anthropogenic climate change. Elite cues outperformed the engaging science lecture condition in increasing student support for action on climate, with politically conservative students driving this relationship, suggesting that the messenger is more important than the message if changing opinions about the necessity of action on climate change is the desired outcome. Relative to the other conditions, the engaging science lecture did not support change in students' perceptions on climate, but appealing to student respect for authority produced positive results. Notably, we observed no decline in students' acceptance of climate science, indicating that none of the conditions induced a backfire effect.

A Research Agenda for Climate Change Communication and Public Opinion: The Role of Scientific Consensus Messaging and Beyond

A 27-country test of communicating the scientific consensus on climate change

Changes in perceived scientific consensus shift beliefs about climate change and GM food safety

Research trends on climate communication in the post-truth era

Six minutes to promote change: People, not facts, alter students' perceptions on climate change

Addressing Global Warming Denialism

Effectively Communicating Climate Science beyond Academia: Harnessing the Heterogeneity of Climate Knowledge

The Need to Focus More on Climate Change Communication and Incorporate More Systems Approaches

Public Awareness of the Scientific Consensus on Climate

A Systems Map of the Challenges of Climate Communication

Understanding scientists' communication challenges at the intersection of climate and agriculture.

Computational methods for the analysis of climate change communication: Towards an integrative and reflexive approach

What Framework Promotes Saliency of Climate Change Issues on Online Public Agenda: A Quantitative Study of Online Knowledge Community Quora

Orchestrating the climate choir: the boundaries of scientists' expertise, the relevance of experiential knowledge, and quality assurance in the public climate debate

Evidence for three distinct climate change audience segments with varying belief-updating tendencies: implications for climate change communication

Experimental Effects of Climate Messages Vary Geographically

New approaches to understanding the role of the news media in the formation of public attitudes and behaviours on climate change

Capably Communicating Science

Basic Status, Research Hotspots, and Prospects

Ten New Insights in Climate Science 2024

Evolution of the Knowledge Mapping of Climate Change Communication Research: Basic Status, Research Hotspots, and Prospects