Abstract:Implementing green fiscal and tax policies for reducing emissions and pollution without negatively impacting economic growth remains a challenge. We aimed to determine whether environmental protection and economic growth can both be attained under a green fiscal and tax policy. Specifically, we created a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model to explore the environmental, economic, and welfare impacts of green fiscal and tax policies. Additionally, a welfare analysis based on an environmental DSGE (E-DSGE) model was performed. We found that (1) raising the environmental or energy tax rate was beneficial for reducing emissions and environmental pollution. However, this approach inhibited economic growth, an outcome not conducive to improving welfare. (2) Increasing the subsidy rate for emission reduction not only incentivized businesses to reduce emissions but also improved economic growth and welfare. (3) The emission reduction mechanisms of environmental tax policies, energy tax policies, and subsidy policies are different. Among them, the environmental tax policy and the energy tax policy both reduce pollution by forcing businesses to increase their emission reduction efforts, but the former is a tax on pollution emissions, while the latter is a tax on energy consumption. However, emission reduction subsidy policies incentivize companies to increase their emission reduction efforts and reduce pollution emissions by alleviating their financial burden. (4) Increasing government spending on environmental remediation could promote economic growth. However, considering that this does not motivate companies to reduce emissions, increasing their share will lead to a reduction in emission reduction subsidies, ultimately negatively impacting social welfare. (5) An environmental tax would cause greater losses in welfare than an energy tax. These findings will enable policymakers to optimize expenditures and tax systems.

Green Tax Reform in Australia in the Presence of Improved Environment-Induced Productivity Gain: Does it Offer Sustainable Recovery from a Post-COVID-19 Recession?

Environmental costs: Revive China's green GDP programme.

Combining economic recovery with climate change mitigation: A global evaluation of financial instruments

A Science-Policy Framework for a Green Economic Recovery After the COVID-19 Pandemic

Impact of fiscal policies and green financing on firm innovation and firm value for green economic recovery

Green recovery in the wake of public health emergencies: Policy instruments and their effects in China

The Perceived Effectiveness and Hidden Inequity of Postpandemic Fiscal Stimuli

Charting a "Green Path" for Recovery from COVID-19

Limited Impact of COVID-19 Recovery Packages on Near-Term CO2 Emissions Pathways

COVID-19 recovery packages can benefit climate targets and clean energy jobs, but scale of impacts and optimal investment portfolios differ among major economies

Assessing the role of energy finance, green policies, and investment towards green economic recovery

Environmental Benefits From Carbon Tax in the Chinese Carbon Market: A Roadmap to Energy Efficiency in the Post-COVID-19 Era

PUBLIC SPENDING AS A NEW DETERMINATE OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOAL AND GREEN ECONOMIC RECOVERY: POLICY PERSPECTIVE ANALYSIS IN THE POST-COVID ERA

Green Aid Tax Relief Participation Scheme – A Study about a Creative Environmental Tax Towards Carbon Reduction in the Post – Covid 19 Era

COVID-19 and a Green Recovery?

Ensuring Global Health Equity in a Post-pandemic Economy

Towards green economic recovery: how to improve green total factor productivity

Environmental Tax Reform and the European Green Deal: Empirical Evidence from Panel Data Analysis

Green Fiscal and Tax Policies in China: An Environmental Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Approach

A computable general equilibrium analysis of environmental tax reform in Japan with a forward-looking dynamic model

Environmental Tax Reform for Green Growth:A European Perspective