Infographic. Consensus recommendations on the classification, definition and diagnostic criteria of hip-related pain in young and middle-aged active adults from the International Hip-related Pain Research Network, Zurich 2018

Michael P Reiman,Rintje Agricola,Joanne L Kemp,Joshua J Heerey,Adam Weir,Pim van Klij,Ara Kassarjian,Andrea B Mosler,Eva Ageberg,Per Hölmich,Kristian Marstrand Warholm,Damian Griffin,Sue Mayes,Karim M Khan,Kay M Crossley,Mario Bizzini,Nancy Bloom,Nicola C Casartelli,Laura E Diamond,Stephanie Di Stasi,Michael Drew,Daniel J Friedman,Matthew Freke,Sion Glyn-Jones,Boris Gojanovic,Marcie Harris-Hayes,Michael A Hunt,Franco M Impellizzeri,Lasse Ishøi,Denise M Jones,Matthew G King,Peter R Lawrenson,Michael Leunig,Cara L Lewis,Nicolas Mathieu,Håvard Moksnes,May Arna Risberg,Mark J Scholes,Adam I Semciw,Andreas Serner,Kristian Thorborg,Adam Virgile,Tobias Wörner,H Paul Dijkstra
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102219
IF: 18.4793
2020-08-31
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Abstract:Young and middle-aged active adults with hip and groin pain often present with a confusing overlap of signs and symptoms. There is no consensus on how to define or classify hip disease with different and overlapping intra-articular and extra-articular contributors to symptoms in an anatomically complex region. Several researchers and consensus groups have previously attempted to define aspects of hip and groin pain.1–4 In 2017, the International Hip Pain Research Network (IHiPRN) was established to facilitate collaboration across research groups and disciplines and to improve knowledge dissemination of hip-related pain to clinicians. In this paper,5 published in the <i>British Journal of Sports Medicine</i>, we first describe the general consensus process applied to all topics in this series. We then make recommendations on the first topic on how to classify, define and diagnose hip disease in young and middle-aged active...
sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?