Abstract:Roxanne Bavarian, 1, 2 Tamunodiyepriye Gift Ngo, 3 Michael E Schatman, 4, 5 Ronald J Kulich 3, 6 1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; 2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; 3 Orofacial Pain Center, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; 4 Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care, & Pain Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; 5 Department of Population Health – Division of Medical Ethics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; 6 Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine/Department of Psychiatry Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Correspondence: Michael E Schatman, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care & Pain Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA, Tel +1 425-647-4880, Email Educational efforts in pain medicine have been a mainstay of international academic organizations for more than 50 years. For example, the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) was one of the first of these organizations, and continues today with a mission that includes "exchange of ideas and education to stimulate and support the study of pain and to translate that knowledge into improved pain relief worldwide". 1 However, as commercial industry sponsors found an audience for the marketing of their products and services, a number of pain educational groups went awry. By the late 1990s, external forces seemingly brought increased accountability to the field, and efforts were made to improve educational programs with transparency regarding conflicts of interest and to deliver more evidence-based content and decrease bias. Nonetheless, the problem remains especially challenging within the field of chronic pain, an area of practice in which a number of treatments continue to be supported despite inconsistent evidence for safety and efficacy. Multiple challenges continue to face pain educators today, such as upholding standards of academic integrity, minimizing conflicts of interest and bias, and maintaining interdisciplinary communication, while remaining accessible for healthcare providers, researchers, patients, and other stakeholders. The Lyceum for Pain Education and its weekly Interdisciplinary Pain and Headache Rounds offer one such template to meet these challenges and mitigate common problems with pain education. Upon switching to a virtual format after 20 years due to the COVID-19 crisis, these seminars provide evidence-based continuing education (CE) to clinicians, researchers, and public policy makers who have an interest in a wide variety of pain topics. The programs are provided at no cost to attendees, with sponsorship derived from philanthropic efforts as opposed to industry funding. In this article, we discuss the challenges that face CE and our experience in navigating them. One significant problem that faced many CE offerings in the late 1990s was not only due to the impact of industry bias, but due to the absence of independent scientific reviewers. 2 For example, a 2007 annual report from the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) determined that more than 30,000 CME activities each year were sponsored by for-profit medical education and communication centers that received approximately 90% of their income from commercial support. 2,3 In our experience, many CE committees play a minimal role in vetting the materials that they sponsor. Rather, speakers are recruited by program planners who are thought to be experts in the field. This model of recruitment is in contrast to the model typically utilized in scientific writing and publishing, in which a critical independent review of the scientific content is necessary. The field of pain medicine can easily find itself susceptible to "junk science", alongside any other field in which patient suffering is great, treatment pathways are weak, and financial incentives persist. Some may be surprised that these issues are not new, and in fact, clinicians and academicians in the 19th century fought the same battles. Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr., an early champion of evidence-based medicine, lectured and wrote extensively on the issue: "When a half-starving medical man felt that he must give his patient draught and boluses for which he could charge him, he was in a pitiable position and too likely to persuade himself that his drugs were useful to his patient because they were profitable to him". 4 At the Lyceum for Pain Education, our Board of Directors consists of specialists in neurology, pain psychology, nursing, orofacial -Abstract Truncated-

Integrating Evidence-Based Guidelines on Pain and Opioids into Medical School Education

Developing a national undergraduate medical education pain management and substance use disorder curriculum to address the opioid crisis: a program evaluation pilot study

Deconstructing One Medical School’s Pain Curriculum: II. Partnering with Medical Students on an Evidence-Guided Redesign

How a Medication for Opioid Use Disorder Curriculum Translates into Experiences and Internal Medicine Residents’ Understanding of Patients with Opioid Use Disorder

Expanding Medical Education to Include Substance Use Disorders During Pregnancy and Postpartum: Preliminary Effectiveness of a Pilot Curriculum for Medical Students

Shifts in Students' Attitudes Towards Pain Patients, Pain, and Opioid Management Following a Dedicated Medical School Pain Curriculum

Improving Healthcare Professionals' Access to Addiction Medicine Education Through VHA Addiction Scholars Program

OPIOIDS: cultivating interprofessional collaboration to find solutions to public health problems

The current state of training in pain medicine fellowships: An Association of Pain Program Directors (APPD) survey of program directors

A Systematic Approach to Opioid Prescribing

Impact of an Education Module on the Knowledge and Attitudes of EM Physicians Towards Prescribing Buprenorphine/Naloxone for Opioid Use Disorder

The Lyceum for Pain Education: Providing Accessible Education on Chronic Pain and Headaches to a Global Audience

Outcomes of an Interprofessional Opioid Training Program for Graduate Students in Nursing and Social Work

Harm reduction in undergraduate and graduate medical education: a systematic scoping review

Lean Six Sigma quality improvement approach to implement clinical practice guidelines for prescribing opiates for chronic pain in a primary care setting

Buprenorphine management in the perioperative period: educational review and recommendations from a multisociety expert panel

The Impact Of Initiating & Discontinuing Buprenorphine On Patient Outcomes and Providing Quality Pain Management

A novel Project ECHO curriculum on older adult pain management and opioid use disorder for outpatient clinicians

Emergency Department-Based Medication for Opioid Use Disorder Program: Addressing Gaps in Linkages to Care

Drug-related physician continuing medical education requirements, 2010-2020

Improving Pain Management for Marginalized Communities: Educating the Next Generation of Health Care Professionals