Abstract:Determining biological status of freshwater ecosystems is critical for ensuring ecosystem health and maintaining associated services to such ecosystems. Freshwater macroinvertebrates respond predictably to environmental disturbances and are widely used in biomonitoring programs. However, many freshwater species are difficult to capture and sort from debris or substrate and morphological identification is challenging, especially larval stages, damaged specimens, or hyperdiverse groups such as Diptera. The advent of high throughput sequencing technologies has enhanced DNA barcoding tools to automatise species identification for whole communities, as metabarcoding is increasingly used to monitor biodiversity. However, recent comparisons have revealed little congruence between morphological and molecular-based identifications. Using broad range universal primers for DNA barcode marker cox1, we compare community composition captured between morphological and molecular-based approaches from different sources - tissue-based (bulk benthic and bulk drift samples) and environmental DNA (eDNA, filtered water) metabarcoding - for samples collected along a gradient of anthropogenic disturbances. For comparability, metabarcoding taxonomic assignments were filtered by taxa included in the standardised national biological metric IBMWP. At the family level, bulk benthic metabarcoding showed the highest congruence with morphology, and the most abundant taxa were captured by all techniques. Richness captured by morphology and bulk benthic metabarcoding decreased along the gradient, whereas richness recorded by eDNA remained constant and increased downstream when sequencing bulk drift. Estimates of biological metrics were higher using molecular than morphological identification. At species level, diversity captured by bulk benthic samples were higher than the other techniques. Importantly, bulk benthic and eDNA metabarcoding captured different and complementary portions of the community - benthic versus water column, respectively - and their combined use is recommended. While bulk benthic metabarcoding can likely replace morphology using similar benthic biological indices, water eDNA will require new metrics because this technique sequences a different portion of the community.

Environmental DNA identifies marine macrophyte contributions to Blue Carbon sediments

Identifying and protecting macroalgae detritus sinks toward climate change mitigation

Patterns and drivers of macroalgal 'blue carbon' transport and deposition in near-shore coastal environments

Environmental DNA metabarcoding of intertidal meiofauna sheds light on its potential for habitat discovery

Role of macroalgal forests within Mediterranean shallow bays in blue carbon storage

DNA metabarcoding reveals the diversity of small-sized macroalgae ignored by traditional monitoring in a coastal ecosystem

Plant DNA metabarcoding of lake sediments: How does it represent the contemporary vegetation

The Core of the Matter—Importance of Identification Method and Biological Replication for Benthic Marine Monitoring

Environmental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methods

eDNA metabarcoding warms up a hotspot of marine biodiversity: revealing underrepresented taxa in visual surveys and historical records from the Gulf of California

Detection of introduced and resident marine species using environmental DNA metabarcoding of sediment and water

Sequestration of macroalgal carbon: the elephant in the Blue Carbon room

Capturing open ocean biodiversity: Comparing environmental DNA metabarcoding to the continuous plankton recorder

Contrasting Phytoplankton Diversity in Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal Based on Environmental DNA

Autochthonous carbon loading of macroalgae stimulates benthic biological nitrogen fixation rates in shallow coastal marine sediments

Metabarcoding of microeukaryotes in surface sediments from the Pacific Arctic and adjacent sea areas: The role of diatoms in the biological pump

Taxonomic and abundance biases affect the record of marine eukaryotic plankton communities in sediment DNA archives

Harnessing the power of eDNA technology for macroalgal ecological studies: Recent advances, challenges, and future perspectives

Exploring the Use of Environmental DNA (eDNA) to Detect Animal Taxa in the Mesopelagic Zone

Blue carbon: past, present and future, with emphasis on macroalgae

Taxonomic accuracy and complementarity between bulk and eDNA metabarcoding provides an alternative to morphology for biological assessment of freshwater macroinvertebrates