Abstract:Introduction Oral surgeons often encounter a significant occupational risk of exposure to potentially harmful infectious diseases during minor oral surgical procedures. These diseases can be transmitted through direct contact with body fluids and aerosolized splatters that may not be visibly detectable. The likelihood of transmission is heightened for clinicians, healthcare workers, and patients alike. The reported prevalence of exposure to blood-borne infections in this field is as high as 90%, with half of these exposures being visually imperceptible. Aim The aim was to detect visually imperceptible blood contamination on personal protective equipment (PPE) and clinical surfaces using the chemiluminescence agent luminol during oral surgical procedures. Materials and methods Thirty minor oral surgical procedures were performed in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department after obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC), Vinayaka Mission's Sankarachariyar Dental College, Vinayaka Mission's Research Foundation, Salem, India. The surgeon, assistant, patient, and clinical surfaces (comprising 15 subsites within the surgical field) wore PPE. The PPE was scrutinized for traces of visually imperceptible blood contamination using luminol. The results of blood splatter on PPE and clinical surfaces in different oral surgical procedures between the non-aerosol and aerosol groups of different durations were analyzed statistically using the chi-square test with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results We observed that visually imperceptible blood contamination in non-aerosol procedures was detected on the assistant PPE kit (46.7%, n = 14), assistant face shield (40%, n = 12), suction apparatus (50%, n = 15), wall (30%, n = 9), and floor (56.7%, n = 17), in both aerosol and non-aerosol procedures. The p-value has been considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 between both the groups (aerosol and non-aerosol). Conclusion Our study results confirmed the presence of undetected blood spillage during aerosol procedures of 30 minutes and non-aerosol surgical procedures of more than 30 minutes over an area of 3.1 feet horizontally and 4.8 feet vertically. So, we strongly emphasize that PPE kits and face shields are mandatory for both surgeon and assistant while performing oral surgical procedures in order to prevent the risk of cross infections, proper infection prevention control protocol for the clinical surfaces also needs to be followed as a standard protocol in all operations.

Bacterial contamination of protective lead garments in an operating room setting

Evaluation of bacterial presence on lead X-ray aprons utilised in the operating room via IBIS and standard culture methods

Bacterial contamination of surgeons gloves during shunt insertion: a pilot study

Bacterial contamination of endoscopist and assistant face visors during gastrointestinal endoscopy: a pilot study

Many Common Pathogens are Present in the Operative Room Air During Surgery

Surgical Masks As Source of Bacterial Contamination During Operative Procedures

Bacterial contamination of surgical gloves during clean orthopedic surgery

Contamination rate of the surgical gowns during total hip arthroplasty

Exploring bacterial growth and recolonization after preoperative hand disinfection and surgery between operating room nurses and non-health care workers: a pilot study

Inter-professional differences in compliance with standard precautions in operating theatres: A multi-site, mixed methods study

Bacterial Contamination of Surgical Instruments Used at the Surgery Department of a Major Teaching Hospital in a Resource-Limited Country: An Observational Study

Detection of Visually Imperceptible Blood Contamination in the Surgical Area Using Luminol Among Different Oral Surgical Procedures: An Observational Study

Lead-Dust Contamination on Radiation Protection Apparel

Assessment of Environmental Contamination with Pathogenic Bacteria at a Hospital Laundry Facility

Gloves Contamination During Revision Surgery for Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Environment and body contamination: A comparison of two different removal methods in three types of personal protective clothing

The need for maximal sterile barrier precaution in routine interventional coronary procedures; microbiology analysis

Is there value in the routine practice of discarding the incision scalpel from the surgical field to prevent deep wound contamination with Cutibacterium acnes? An update

Still Not Sterile: Chlorhexidine gluconate treatment does not completely reduce skin microbial bioburden and promotes pathogen overabundance in patients undergoing elective surgeries.

Metagenomic insights into microbial contamination in critical healthcare environments and the efficacy of a novel "HLE" disinfectant

Operation Field Contamination During Intraoperative Fluoroscopy