Implicit Learning out of the Lab: Language and Music.
Patrick Rebuschat,Martin Rohrmeier,Morten H. Christiansen,Zoltan Dienes,Daniele Schön,Jennifer Misyak,Clément François,Xiuyan Guo,Feifei Li,Richard Widdess
IF: 2.617
2013-01-01
Cognitive Science
Abstract:Implicit Learning Out of the Lab: Language and Music Patrick Rebuschat (p.rebuschat@lancaster.ac.uk) Martin Rohrmeier (mr1@mit.edu) Department of Linguistics and English Language Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA Morten H. Christiansen (christiansen@cornell.edu) Zoltan Dienes (dienes@sussex.ac.uk) Department of Psychology, Cornell University Ithaca, NY, USA School of Psychology, University of Sussex Brighton, United Kingdom Clement Francois (cfrancois@idibell.cat) Daniele Schon (daniele.schon@incm.cnrs-mrs.fr) Xiuyan Guo (xyguo@psy.ecnu.edu.cn) Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China INSERM U 1106, Institut de Neuroscience des Systemes Aix-Marseille Universite, Marseille, France Shan Jiang (jiangs988@126.com) Feifei Li (lifeifei1206@163.com) School of Social Administration, Shanghai University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai, China School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China Jennifer B. Misyak (jennifer.misyak@wbs.ac.uk) Richard Widdess (rw4@soas.ac.uk) Behavioural Science Group, Warwick Business School University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom Department of Music, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, United Kingdom Keywords: Implicit learning; statistical learning; explicit learning; music cognition; language acquisition. towards the use of more ecologically-valid stimuli. In addition to introducing novel and exciting subject areas, the research discussed in this symposium also reflects the strong tendency, within cognitive science, for methodological diversification. The talks will discuss data from behavioral and neurophysiological experiments as well as results of computational modeling. Goals and Scope Implicit learning, essentially the ability to acquire unconscious (implicit) knowledge, is a fundamental aspect of human cognition. This symposium focuses on the acquisition of two cognitive systems that are widely regarded as prime examples of implicit learning “in the real world”, namely language and music (see e.g. Rebuschat et al., 2011; Rohrmeier & Rebuschat, 2012). This symposium brings together leading researchers from across the cognitive sciences (psychology, linguistics, cognitive neuroscience, computer science, and musicology) in order to discuss current trends in implicit learning research, to identify the progress made in recent years, and to outline future directions to take, both in terms of topics and novel methodologies. The symposium will consist of five talks, followed by a brief general discussion. Each talk approaches the symposium topic from a highly innovative and interdisciplinary angle. Christiansen and Misyak focus on individual differences in implicit language learning, while Rebuschat concentrates on the role of implicit and explicit learning in second language (L2) acquisition. Francois and Schon’s work demonstrates the impressive effect of musical practice on the implicit learning of linguistic structure, while the last two talks, by Dienes and colleagues and by Rohrmeier and Widdess, focus on the implicit learning of Chinese tonal poetry and of syntactic features of North Indian music, respectively. These last two studies reflect a particularly important trend in implicit learning research Morten H. Christiansen and Jennifer B. Misyak Individual differences in implicit statistical learning and language Over the past decade, implicit learning under the guise of statistical learning has emerged as an important experimental paradigm with which to study mechanisms involved in language acquisition. Although few empirical studies have directly linked variation across statistical learning and language, it is generally assumed that greater sensitivity to statistical structure leads to better language performance. Here, we report the results of studies investigating the relationship of individual differences in statistical learning of adjacent and nonadjacent dependencies to variations in the processing of local and nonlocal dependencies in natural language. Together, the results indicate that individual differences in statistical learning are positively related to variations in language processing. However, the complexity of the pattern of interrelations suggests that future developmental and adult work on implicit statistical learning must incorporate careful attention to a diversity of natural dependency-structures to establish the proper relationship between adjacent and nonadjacent manifestations of statistical learning and the