Refining the Short Version of the Leadership Scale for Sports: Factorial Validation and Measurement Invariance

Pedro Teques,Carlos Silva,António Rosado,Luís Calmeiro,Sidónio Serpa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120953560
IF: 2.3
2020-09-01
Psychological Reports
Abstract:The purpose of this investigation was to examine the factorial validity and measurement invariance of the short version of the Leadership Scale for Sports (LSS; Chelladurai & Saleh, 1980 ): coaches’ perceptions of their own behavior, athletes’ preferences and athletes’ perceptions of their coaches’ behavior. This validation will allow researchers to minimize time demands on participants. Three independent samples of athletes ( n 1 = 373; n 2 = 817; n 3 = 246) and two samples of coaches ( n 1 = 115; n 2 = 351) were studied to examine the factorial validity and measurement invariance of the 25-item version of the LSS (LSS-25; Chiu et al., 2016 ). Findings indicated that a 15-item version (LSS-15) fits the data better than the LSS-25. The LSS-15 showed factorial validity and proved to have adequate reliability, convergent validity and discriminant validity. Multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis showed that its factor structure was invariant across two independent samples and across gender for athletes’ perceived and preferred versions. Significant relationships between the LSS-15 subscales and athlete satisfaction also demonstrate criterion validity. These findings support a valid and reliable alternative to the original LSS long-form, especially in applied settings when time constraints require a brief measure of leadership or when study designs include multiple variables.
psychology, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?