Tangible and Intangible Heritage in Urban Agriculture: Australia Experiences

Jane Lennon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49012-6_6
2020-01-01
Abstract:The major cities of Australia were established as ports, as gateways for each British colony, in the first half of the nineteenth century. Food was grown nearby to supply people and their stock. This pattern persisted until the rapid growth of these cities after WWII. From this time, local government planning schemes developed and protected open space in urban areas, but not always the agricultural land use. Australia has historically concentrated on increasing the productivity and competitiveness of agriculture rather than managing land use change. Apart from a few planning and environmental regulations to protect some of the rich alluvial valleys or sand plains from urban expansion, the use of land has been subject to minimal governance or strategic direction. This attitude contrasts with Europe where the aesthetic and cultural heritage is a central objective as well as continuing the food supply. Intangible heritage is illustrated by place names and traditional farmers within the urban areas, agricultural shows, and backyard and communal vegetable gardens, but often the tangible heritage of agricultural field patterns, their fences and structures, have been destroyed. This chapter discusses the tangible and intangible heritage in Australia and examines some of the issues involved in heritage listing and the protection of agricultural land.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?