Backward Walking and Dual-Task Assessment Improve Identification of Gait Impairments and Fall Risk in Individuals with MS

Erin M. Edwards,Deborah A. Kegelmeyer,Anne D. Kloos,Manon Nitta,Danya Raza,Deborah S. Nichols-Larsen,Nora E. Fritz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6707414
2020-09-08
Multiple Sclerosis International
Abstract:Background . Individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience deficits in motor and cognitive domains, resulting in impairment in dual-task walking ability. The goal of this study was to compare performance of forward walking and backward walking in single- and dual-task conditions in persons with MS to age- and sex-matched healthy controls. We also examined relationships between forward and backward walking to cognitive function, balance, and retrospective fall reports. Methods . All measures were collected in a single session. A 2 × 2 × 2 mixed model ANOVA was used to compare differences in forward and backward walking in single- and dual-task conditions between MS and healthy controls. Spearman correlations were used to examine relationships between gait and cognitive function, falls, and balance. Results . Eighteen individuals with relapsing-remitting MS and 14 age- and sex-matched healthy controls participated. Backward walking velocity revealed significant differences between groups for both single-task ( p = 0.015 ) and dual-task ( p = 0.014 ) conditions. Persons with MS demonstrated significant differences between single- and dual-task forward and backward walking velocities ( p = 0.023 ; p = 0.004 ), whereas this difference was only apparent in the backward walking condition for healthy controls ( p = 0.004 ). In persons with MS, there were significant differences in double support time between single- and dual-task conditions in both backward ( p < 0.001 ) and forward ( p = 0.001 ) directions. More falls at six months were significantly associated with shorter backward dual-task stride length ( r = − 0.490 ; p = 0.046 ) and slower velocity ( r = − 0.483 ; p = 0.050 ). Conclusion . Differences in MS and age- and sex-matched healthy controls are more pronounced during backward compared to forward walking under single- and dual-task conditions. Future work with a larger sample size is needed to validate the clinical utility of backward walking and dual-task assessments and mitigate the limited sensitivity of the current dual-task assessments that primarily rely upon forward walking.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?