Association of time in range, as assessed by continuous glucose monitoring, with painful diabetic polyneuropathy

Junpeng Yang,Xueli Yang,Dongni Zhao,Xiaobing Wang,Wei Wei,Huijuan Yuan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13394
2020-09-29
Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Aims/Introduction</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate the association between time in range (TIR) obtained from continuous glucose monitoring and the prevalence and degree of painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Materials and methods</h3><p>A total of 364 subjects with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) were enrolled in this study. Sensor‐based flash glucose monitoring systems were used to monitor the subjects' glucose levels, and the glycemic variability (GV) metrics were calculated, including the TIR, glucose coefficient of variation, standard deviation, and the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions. The participants were asked to record any form of pain during the 2 weeks of monitoring and score the pain every day on a numerical rating scale (NRS). Based on the NRS, the patients were divided into the pain‐free group, mild pain group, and moderate/severe pain group.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Overall, 51.92% (189/364) of the subjects were diagnosed with PDN. Compared to the pain‐free group, the level of TIR decreased significantly in mild pain and moderate/severe pain groups (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05). The prevalence of mild pain and moderate/severe pain decreased with increasing TIR quartiles (all <i>P</i>&lt;0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that TIR was significantly negatively correlated with NRS score after adjustment for HbA1c, GV indicators, and other risk factors (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that decreasing level of TIR was significantly associated with an increasing risk of any pain and moderate/severe pain (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05). </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusion</h3><p>TIR is correlated with PDN and be underscored as a valuable clinical evaluation measure.</p></section>
endocrinology & metabolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?